Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Today's Survey Question

Should the EPA Spend Millions in Foreign Countries?

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

sure!

Think about it, if the EPA spends money and focuses on foreign countries then that means less attention will be drawn to our domestic issues. What does that mean? Our farmers will have less burden on their shoulders from the EPA freaks so more agricultural goods would be produced, car manufacturers won't be so hell bent on emission regulations and development, fuel companies will be less focused on destroying engines with ethanol, and developers will have less scrutiny in their larger projects.

Sure, spend that money on foreign countries, as long as that means we can make MORE money here with the EPA off our butts! I really don't think people know how much the EPA truly adversely affect our economy

Anonymous said...

Since we are in such deep debt and a continuing crisis looms over us, it would seem that we have no business helping other countries to the extent that we do. We better look after America first.

Anonymous said...

I know that this doesn't exactly belong here Joe, but I heard through the grapevine that there were several County employees laid off yesterday to meet budget constraints. I figured that this is newsworthy, but I haven't seen anything on your site or in the paper today. Do you care to investigate???

LadyLiddy said...

NO

Anonymous said...

no! we should stop all aid to foreign countries.

Anonymous said...

The EPS should be disbanded. It has long since lost it's purpose and has becaome just another tool of progressive libtards

Anonymous said...

6:37 PM

If you mean the EPA, I agree. However, using derogatory terms lessens your credibility. Keep it clean.