Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

County, Schools Differ On Same-Sex Benefits

3 comments:

Daddio said...

What county are we talking about here?

Anne Arundel? It would be prudent to include such information in your headlines, or the text of the article without having to click-thru ....

Anonymous said...

If you are a gay employee of the State of MD your partner has been able to be covered for the past couple of years. However, if you are living with your heterosexual partner you are not allowed to cover them. To me that clearly is a case of discrimination and an abuse of taxpayers money!

Anonymous said...

I agree with 716. The definition of "marriage" between a man and a woman should be used for insurance purposes. If someone lives outside that established definition, that is their choice but the benefits should not include them as a dependent for insurance coverage. It is not the state's right to get involved in their partnership choice in either case and it is not the responsibility to cover them either. Same for a county. And, to cover the gay couple and not cover the other IS discriminatory. The gay couple should have no greater benefit than the other.