Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, January 24, 2016

In Case You Missed It: Smoking Pot and Driving Should Be Criminal Offense


Editorial Board – “[W]e think most people would agree that we don't want people smoking pot behind the wheel or in public places.
____________________________________________________________________________________
The Carroll County Times
Editorial Board
January 19, 2016

"Should marijuana and alcohol be treated the same? For all intents and purposes, that's what it comes down to in the Maryland General Assembly's debate on whether to override Gov. Larry Hogan's veto of a bill that reduces smoking marijuana in public from a criminal offense to a civil offense.


"Law enforcement entities, including those in Carroll County, largely applauded last year when Hogan vetoed that bill, among others.


"It was actually two years ago that the legislature decriminalized small amounts of marijuana, making possession of less than 10 grams a civil offense rather than a criminal one. However, in an oversight, lawmakers didn't decriminalize possession of paraphernalia, meaning you could have less than 10 grams of pot and get a civil citation, but be criminally charged for having a pipe to smoke it. We can all agree that didn't make sense. However, attempts to fix it in last year's legislative session included making smoking pot in public a civil violation as well.


"Police, including Carroll County Sheriff Jim DeWees and municipal chiefs in the county, argued that smoking marijuana in public or smoking it while operating or sitting in a vehicle should be a crime, just like drinking alcohol in public or while driving.
"Again, we think most people would agree that we don't want people smoking pot behind the wheel or in public places. …
"However, law enforcement argues that if smoking marijuana behind the wheel isn't a misdemeanor criminal offense, it's not clear whether police can pull over a vehicle driven by someone smoking pot. (Nevermind additional issues of probable cause that arise with a threshold for criminal marijuana possession.) And if police can't initiate the traffic stop, it could be harder to get impaired drivers off the road.


"’If you are operating a motor vehicle smoking it, if you are in a motor vehicle smoking it and a driver is there, someone's driving down the road, they can get high merely by being in the vehicle,’ DeWees told us. ‘So I don't support you being able to smoke marijuana in public or in a vehicle at all. I just believe anybody who thinks that should have their head checked, honestly, because it makes no sense whatsoever.’


"Until that's cleared up, we think the veto should stand, or instead of overriding the veto, a new piece of legislation should be pursued that clears up possession of paraphenilia but keeps smoking in public or behind the wheel a criminal offense, just as having an open container of alcohol would be."

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm more worried about how the 'sober' drivers drive than pot smokers. Tailgaters, excessive speeders, weavers, aggressive ah's, ignorant to the rules of the road are much more dangerous than some pot head going 20 mph below the speed limit.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, let's stop these horrible criminals and take their money and license. Let's give them a criminal record too. Then instead of contribting to society they can sit at home and collect a government check like a good American.

Anonymous said...

As it stands now I could be arrested in my own home just for having a pipe or bong. That is ridiculous.
Just make it illegal to smoke it in a car, just like drinking alcohol in a car. What is so hard here?

Anonymous said...

Ever notice the more freedoms Democrats give you the less free you are?

Anonymous said...

don't want no pothead rear ending me with minimum amount of insurance....

Anonymous said...

Have had this discussion before and it should be treated the same as alcohol. If it isn't then the first time a high driver kills a little kid, all hell will break loose as to why it isn't illegal. Everyone will then backpedal looking to blame the person that should have made it a law.

My ex used to smoke and drive. I am sure she still does. Friends of hers will not ride with her when she was high, and I don't blame them. Drugs change the state of mind, (why else would they be taken?)so when a persons mind is altered, driving skills suffer. This shouldn't even be a discussion, should be common sense.

Anonymous said...

Drug and alcohol users are a determent to our society. But they do provide lots of employment for all kinds of people from counselors to doctors to police to undertakers. I have no idea why anybody supports any of this except for the money they can make selling it and for the trap of "feel good" addiction.

Anonymous said...

Give it a break already. I guess law enforcement and the courts need more revenue.

Anonymous said...

Guess all you anti Poy types prefer big pharmas solution? want to talk about DEATH? Killing? How many potheads, Who for your info Drive already. They can be charged with DUI!! I believe potheads driving Are the least of Our worries. I'm more concerned about the waste of Courts time, police time, for baggies and pot pipes. A bigger Herion problem needs addressing. Give it up! legalize it! tax it! and prosper it's here! and its not going away!! So all useless politicians! get your freaking heads out your butts!!and fix the freaking problem for the paraphernalia issue! and address intoxicated driving which is a no no

Anonymous said...

Guess all you anti Poy types prefer big pharmas solution? want to talk about DEATH? Killing? How many potheads, Who for your info Drive already. They can be charged with DUI!! I believe potheads driving Are the least of Our worries. I'm more concerned about the waste of Courts time, police time, for baggies and pot pipes. A bigger Herion problem needs addressing. Give it up! legalize it! tax it! and prosper it's here! and its not going away!! So all useless politicians! get your freaking heads out your butts!!and fix the freaking problem for the paraphernalia issue! and address intoxicated driving which is a no no

Oh and im a Republican but registered as a independent.

Anonymous said...

So does coffee. Maybe the cops should start pulling over people leaving Starbucks.

LastMohican said...

I knew it would fall on deaf ears to do your own research.

The effect of marijuana use on drivers just became a little less hazy – and not in the way legislators or medical experts might expect.

A new study from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that consuming marijuana does not elevate the crash risk of the driver, a result that’s leaving road safety decision-makers wanting more information.

The study looked at more than 3,000 drivers involved in crashes over a 20-month period in Virginia Beach, Va., measuring which substances — if any — were in their systems at the time of the accident. The study also included 6,000 control drivers in the same area over the same time period who were not involved in any accidents.

“It was the most closely controlled study of its kind that has ever been conducted,” Trowbridge says.

Unsurprisingly, the results showed that drivers with alcohol in their systems were far more likely to crash. Adjusted for age and gender, the study found a driver with a blood alcohol content of .08, the legal limit, is four times as likely to crash as a driver with no alcohol in his or her body. When BAC hits .15, drivers are 12 times as likely to get into an accident.

What’s more unexpected, the odds — adjusted for age and gender — of a driver with THC in his or her system crashing are only 5% higher than those of a sober driver.

Tennant says that Pullman police tend to find drivers under the influence of marijuana only after they’ve been pulled over for a different traffic violation.

“It’s only after that that we detect there’s any intoxication problem,” Tennant says, adding that there’s no particular pattern to the road mistakes these drivers make.

http://college.usatoday.com/2015/02/17/new-study-shows-no-link-between-marijuana-use-and-car-accidents/

Anonymous said...

4:47....
What makes you think that a "pothead" would have no insurance? I smoke daily and I have insurance on 4 vehicles, three homes, my boat, camper, atvs, and/or anything else I own. Id be more concerned with a driver impaired by the booze any day.

Anonymous said...

If you are registered as an independent than you are an .......independent !

LastMohican said...

Anonymous said...
don't want no pothead rear ending me with minimum amount of insurance....

January 20, 2016 at 4:47 PM

there is only a 5% increased risk of being hit by someone smoking pot and driving compared to a sober person.

someone drunk on ALCOHOL, however, has a 12 TIMES increase in being involved in an accident.

once again you demonstrated the emotional rumors people have about pot. can't really blame you I guess since the gov't has brainwashed most into believing those falsehoods.

Republicans are red, Democrats are blue. Neither one gives a crap about you.