Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, February 10, 2012

TOM & NIKKI MCGUIRE ARRESTED FOR SEXUAL CHILD ABUSE & MORE

If it were not for Salisbury News, the public would not be aware of just what these people are all about. Both ran as candidates for Mayor and Town Council in Delmar, Maryland. Imagine IF we had not exposed the fact that they wished Brooke Mulford dead. Imagine if the public had not been made aware of who they are. Imagine if they had been elected, what the Town of Delmar would be dealing with at this point and time.






You may challenge us. Some may dislike us but one thing is for sure, we do far more to educate the public than the MSM. The McGuire's were arrested last night for the charges below, again.



THOMAS MCGUIRE

Case Information
Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR WICOMICO COUNTY - CRIMINAL SYSTEM
Case Number: 2H00062932Tracking No:111002012516
Case Type: CRIMINAL
District Code: 02Location Code:03
Document Type: WARRANTIssued Date:02/09/2012
Case Status: ACTIVE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Information
Defendant Name: MCGUIRE, THOMAS JOHN
Race: WHITE, CAUCASIAN, ASIATIC INDIAN, ARAB
Sex: MHeight:604Weight:200DOB:11/30/1969

Address: 401 E. CHESTNUT STREET
City: DELMARState:MDZip Code:21875 - 0000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge and Disposition Information

(Each Charge is listed separately. The disposition is listed below the Charge)

Charge No: 001Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Statute: CR.3.601.(d)Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0173MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 002Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.203Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 1415MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 003Description:RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT
Statute: CR.3.204.(a)(1)Description:RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 1425MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 004Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Statute: CR.3.602.(b)Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0322MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 005Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.307Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 006Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.308Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:4 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 007Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Statute: CR.3.601.(d)Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0173MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 008Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.203Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 1415MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 009Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Statute: CR.3.602.(b)Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0322MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 010Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.308Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:4 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 11/20/2011 Victim Age:

NICOLE MCGUIRE
Case Information
Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR WICOMICO COUNTY - CRIMINAL SYSTEM
Case Number: 3H00062933Tracking No:111002012520
Case Type: CRIMINAL
District Code: 02Location Code:03
Document Type: WARRANTIssued Date:02/09/2012
Case Status: ACTIVE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defendant Information
Defendant Name: MCGUIRE, NICOLE CRYSTAL
Race: WHITE, CAUCASIAN, ASIATIC INDIAN, ARAB
Sex: FHeight:504Weight:150DOB:03/09/1984

Address: 401 E. CHESTNUT STREET
City: DELMARState:MDZip Code:21875 - 0000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge and Disposition Information

(Each Charge is listed separately. The disposition is listed below the Charge)

Charge No: 001Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Statute: CR.3.601.(d)Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0173MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 002Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.307Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 003Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.308Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:4 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 004Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Statute: CR.3.602.(b)Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0322MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 005Description:PERVERTED PRACTICE
Statute: CR.3.322Description:PERVERTED PRACTICE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:6 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 006Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Statute: CR.3.601.(d)Description:CHILD ABUSE: 2ND DEG -CUST
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0173MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 007Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.203Description:ASSAULT-SEC DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 1415MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 008Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Statute: CR.3.602.(b)Description:SEX ABUSE MINOR
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 0322MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 009Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.307Description:SEX OFFENSE THIRD DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 010Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Statute: CR.3.308Description:SEX OFFENSE FOURTH DEGREE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:4 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge No: 011Description:PERVERTED PRACTICE
Statute: CR.3.322Description:PERVERTED PRACTICE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:6 3600MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: 06/01/2010 To: 08/28/2011 Victim Age:






New Posts to fall below.

43 comments:

Sherry said...

They just need to bury these two under the jail. Anyone that sexually abuses a child should get no consideration at all. This is very sad and I hope the children involved will be ok.

Anonymous said...

why is this not surprising

Anonymous said...

Anon 8:49 is correct. This is not surprising. The signs that these people were perverts have been there all along.

Anonymous said...

Am I reading correctly and Nicole is being held on a million dollar bail?

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but wasn't their swing lifestyle perverted enough without having the involve children? Sickos.

Anonymous said...

According to his blog Jesus endorsed wife swapping.

Anonymous said...

Whomever has the responsiblity-please do not let these perverts out on lower bail! We saw that with Thomas Leggs and his next victim was murdered most likely because he didn't want to leave a witness.

Anonymous said...

Anyone have any more property they want to put up for them? At least the last follish person is safe. McGuire won't flee from his arson charges if he is in custoday for something else.

Anonymous said...

They are no better than Thomas Leggs and should be where he is right now. Leave the children alone, period. That goes for the sicko teachers also.

Anonymous said...

Innocent until proven guilty people

Anonymous said...

People need to know that Jonathan Taylor and Howard Dickerson ENDORSED McGuire for Mayor and Council!!!

Also the readers need to know that these two were utterly rejected at the polls. The town of Delmar should bare no injury to its reputation because of these two scumbags.

Anonymous said...

They are no better than Thomas Leggs????? Seriously 9:22, that is your opinion? A convicted child murderer is the same as this? The McGuires are awful but come on now. 9:22 is no better than Hitler makes about as much sense.

Anonymous said...

They are innocent until proven guilty IN THE EYES OF THE COURT. This does not preclude those of us who have watched McGuire terrorize some very good people in town from forming or voicing an opinion based on some pretty good circumstantial evidence. While that should never be the bar for a court, it is compelling in the court of public opinion.

Anonymous said...

The two commenters who write "Innocent until proven guilty" are right. While what they are accused of are heinous crimes, they operative word is "accused." We are not the jury. Soon enough their charges will be brought to a grand jury, who will decide if there is enough evidence to send to trial.

Anonymous said...

So 9:44 is saying they are better than Leggs just because they didn't kill their victim? In my eyes they are just as bad-complete sickos with no regard for the welfare of children and a danger to society.
As far as innocent until proven guilty, these people announced to the world via the internet that they were perverts, and not only announced it, but seemed mighty darn proud of it, so they can't have it both ways and cry foul now.

Anonymous said...

Yes they are saying it is better because they did not kill a child! Look into the facts of the Leggs case, it is so scary. To compare that to pretty much anything else in the world is crazy. So 10:27, your eyes are stupid.

Anonymous said...

And either did Leggs kill his first and second and I believe third victim but then he did.....
Open your eyes! Child molesters usually do not kill their first vicitm. How many people who are registered sex offenders end up killing? Many!

Anonymous said...

Why isn't this story in the daily times? Thanks for posting this.

Anonymous said...

Don't they go to a grand jury FIRST before a warrant is issued?

Anonymous said...

They each should be confined to the Clifton T. Perkins facility for the criminally insane. Reminds me of the movie 'The Bad Seed'. The McGuires are inherently evil, and society-at-large should be protected.

Anonymous said...

If you abuse a child you should be thrown into one catergory, and that is scum bag. Leggs, these people, all of those who prey on children should be locked up. I am pretty sure Arson is a serious crime as well. With their back against the wall I am sure these two would kill someone as well if it was between them or no witnesses. $1,000,000 bail for both says it all. This is not a court room so no we do not havbe to base our OPINION on innocent before proven guilty when we have been reading about these two on this blog for YEARS. WE SAW WHAT WAS COMING, now it is here. If you want ot believe in innocent before proven guilty then get off the site and stop commenting.

Anonymous said...

@10:52 how would they go to the grand jury before a warrant is issued? They need the warrant to arrest them to bring them infront of the grand jury.

Anonymous said...

9:09 am You think Jesus will endorse his bond.

Anonymous said...

Not true, 11:00.

Anonymous said...

In this case 9:09 I really don't care what Jesus would do or not do. I only care about sickos running around preying on children. And now the sickos have been caught and who knows what is going on in their mental case heads.

Anonymous said...

"@10:52 how would they go to the grand jury before a warrant is issued? They need the warrant to arrest them to bring them infront of the grand jury."

Absolutely incorrect. The Grand Jury can issue an arrest warrant/Indictment.

Anonymous said...

To all that say innocent to proven guilty, in this case your wrong, this has nothing to do with the arson case, this case has been building since early December when the couple had a huge fight and child services were called in, both kid went through counciling along with both Nicole and Tom,disturbing rock solid evidense was discovered, trust me these sickos are guilty. This case is rock solid. Both have been getting affairs in order, they knew it was coming.

Anonymous said...

"@10:52 how would they go to the grand jury before a warrant is issued? They need the warrant to arrest them to bring them infront of the grand jury."

Absolutely incorrect. The Grand Jury can issue an arrest warrant/Indictment.

Yopu just said I am absolutely incorrect but then restated the same this I said. If you read my comment it says they need the arrest warrant BEFORE going to the grand jury meaning the grand jury CAN issure a warrant for arrest before they ever step in court.

Anonymous said...

I've always thought Nicole McGuire was just gross! Any mother who would beg for sex on the internet is without a doubt an unfit person. Who in their right mind would subject their children to the possible ridicule and the ostracism that could result from classmates and parents finding out.

Anonymous said...

Am I reading something into this that isn't there? Have the McGuires abused their own children? This reminds me of a case in Baltimore many years ago where a father shot down a defendant in the courtroom who had raped his daughter, a 10 year old, who had required a surgical repair. When he went to trial, he was found not guilty. The rapist was his brother-in-law.

Anonymous said...

They abused their two boys??

Anonymous said...

Why is this not in the Daily Times?

They make Joe Albero out to be a criminal for a fender bender and Tim Spies out to be a criminal for not painting his house, but this gets not a word?

The accusations make me want to vomit and the Daily Times makes me want to vomit.

JoeAlbero said...

Funny you should mention that. I made sure first thing this morning that the Daily Times was aware of the McGuire's. Very interesting. One thing is for sure, THEY DO KNOW.

Anonymous said...

I should not have written "innocent until found guilty." "Innocent" and "not guilty" are two different things. For example, in his criminal trial, OJ Simpson was found "not guilty," certainly not innocent. That is why the family of Ron Goldman went after Simpson in a civil court, where he was found guilty and ordered to pay a huge sum of money. The McGuires are probably guilty,though a court may find them not so based on the evidence (or lack of it) they have. A not guilty verdict will NOT mean that they're innocent.

Idid serve on a grand jury. The state's attorney's office will present the jury with loads of evidence. The SA does not go to the grand jury with weak evidence. In some of the cases that I worked on, there were huge stacks of written material as well as, in some cases, audio-visual (e.g. DVD's showing strong sexual content featuring underage children).

The police agencies and the SA office will sort all the evidence out, and then the McGuires will have their day in court; it looks as if they better hire a really good attorney.

Anonymous said...

I don't know it was their own children but whoever the victim/victims were it went on for sometime and wasn't just an isolated incident. According to case search the incident occured from June until Aug for her and until Nov for him. This is prolonged sexual abuse and assaultings !!! Sickening!

Anonymous said...

The charges almost took all your blog space

Anonymous said...

I knew the first time I saw them on your blog that they were perverts you could just look at them and tell.What a bunch if sickos.

Anonymous said...

The incidents were from June of 2010 until 2011.
Could this be another house of horrors like the dr's office in Lewes?

Anonymous said...

Just a tip for you joe:
In speaking of the town of delmar there is a brand new white pickup truck that has the town of delmar sticker on both sides of the vehicle that is at a place called the marketstreet deli in POCOMOKE eating dinner EVERY NIGHT and the way I see it is if the town of delmar is paying for his gas to get back and forth to work no wonder he can afford to eat out every night LOL

Anonymous said...

Anyone have any more property they want to put up for them? At least the last follish person is safe. McGuire won't flee from his arson charges if he is in custoday for something else.

Anonymous said...

In my eyes they are just as bad-complete sickos with no regard for the welfare of children and a danger to society.
As far as innocent until proven guilty, these people announced to the world via the internet that they were perverts, and not only announced it, but seemed mighty darn proud of it, so they can't have it both ways and cry foul now.

Anonymous said...

Several of my friends had issues with McGuire trying to send them swinging websites to look at, and recently someone was trying to friend Bunky Luffman's family on facebook which is creepy in it's on right. Tom and Nikki loved to post swinging and alternative lifestyle items on their web page since closed. The sad part is there are children in this family that I wish didn't have to be involved or associated with this mess for the rest of their lives.

Anonymous said...

Well I can't honestly say I was surprised at the news that the McGuires were charged with assault, second-degree child abuse, and sex offense, plus Nikki McGuire being charged with perverted practice whatever that was. The McGuires were always a very strange bunch, I didn't know them very well and actually had never met them in person, but they had a habit of doing some weird things. It was just I think last month or so the entire arson incident was in the news regarding the house next door.