"The primary complaint is that we think it violates the First Amendment for the government to require people who produce a lawful product to essentially urge prospective purchasers not to buy it," says Floyd Abrams, a prominent First Amendment case expert who's representing the plaintiffs.
3 comments:
..unconstitutionally infringe on the companies' rights?
No, it's STUPID!
With all the government involvement in education, why hasn't it occurred to these people to have a mandatory curriculum that educates kids on why they may not want to take up smoking? These (stupid) warning labels aren't seen by the kids until they're already smoking, buying the product, and providing government all that tax revenue.
So you are FOR government involvement in education, Al?
Isn't already or do you live on a different planet?
Let them do something beneficial for a change.
Post a Comment