The Obamas attended church for 20 years with an exposed racist as the minister spewing white hatred the entire time he was in the pulpit. The Obamas chose to attend until he was finally exposed and the political impact was too great to overcome. They sat in those pews for 20 years and listened to the hatred and racism. I won't be convinced they did not believe the bs that was being preached. Do you think she is an angry black woman?
11:39 is correct.She is the sole author of the "angry black woman" statement.The book that supposedly brought this about never made any such statement.
A picture that I have seen several times of her at some event--I forget what--has circulated and shows her sitting next to her husband, "cutting her eyes" at him and wearing a huge scowl. I thought at the time," I wonder what she's so angry at?" We all get scowls from time to time, but she should remember that she will be photographed wherever she is. Her whole history seems to be mired in anger, particularly at the white race.
17 comments:
We, just look at her!!!
No, just more racist media hype designed to dog whistle the angry white man.
She is the one who made the statement that she "wasn't an angry black woman."
no, i do not think she is an angry black woman.
She's angry and she's black. You do the math.
The Obamas attended church for 20 years with an exposed racist as the minister spewing white hatred the entire time he was in the pulpit. The Obamas chose to attend until he was finally exposed and the political impact was too great to overcome. They sat in those pews for 20 years and listened to the hatred and racism. I won't be convinced they did not believe the bs that was being preached. Do you think she is an angry black woman?
YES!! Angry that she's gonna lose all that power in November!!!!
Simply because Michelle is educated,articulate, refined, and who is a high-achiever does not make her an "angry" black woman.
No, but there are a lot of angry, sore losers who cannot get over the last election
11:39 is correct.She is the sole author of the "angry black woman" statement.The book that supposedly brought this about never made any such statement.
A picture that I have seen several times of her at some event--I forget what--has circulated and shows her sitting next to her husband, "cutting her eyes" at him and wearing a huge scowl. I thought at the time," I wonder what she's so angry at?" We all get scowls from time to time, but she should remember that she will be photographed wherever she is. Her whole history seems to be mired in anger, particularly at the white race.
I really don't care if she is mad,sad,bad,glad or generally pissed off. I'll just be glad when I don't have to look at her anymore.
Yes. Because she married a fake!
No
First color has nothing to do with it. She is a ANGRY woman period!But mix the two and you have an angry black woman.
there aren't very many pictures in circulation of this woman smiling, so it leads one to believe she is an angry woman
At least she is "finally proud to be an American"!
Post a Comment