This is unbelievable.
Nearly two dozen cases have been filed to force the President Elect to show a Judge of the Supreme Court his original Birth Certificate, his college applications, and his passport, but each time they have gotten thrown out on a technicality.
Is someone pulling some big strings here?...
Now the latest is that John Brennan, Obamas selection for Intelligence Advisor is the former head of the company that 'Breached' the passports of Obama, Clinton and McCain! Question is .... Is this quid pro quo ?
Read more...
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
10 comments:
Double standard is the staus quo!
you got that right!
I guess Chicago politics has come to DC. He isn't even your President yet and the corruption begins to swirl. (Yeah...I am a Salisbury resident, but as far as I am concerned..not my President)
Wait til Obama replaces the three that are goin to retire or die soon, well be dealing with the court for decades to come.
COuld it be that the "cases" have no merit?
Naw that couldn't be it.
Anon 1:32
Do you think the qualifications for a person to serve as the President of the United States are - without merit? Are you drunk?
What is wrong with you?
Anon:
With all of the fuss about his Birth Cert. aren't you even the least bit interested?
Doesn't it strike you as a tad disingenuous that he pays $100s of thousands of dollars in legal fees to not show us something you and I have to pay $15. for to obtain a drivers license yet he will become the leader of the 'fascist',oops I mean 'free' world,and he won't show anything?
Anon 2:20 pm and Wymzie
The only fuss that is being made is by people with nothing else to do.
The Supreme Court rejects these "cases" because it has better things to do with it's time. They have no merit.
As stated before Obama answered these original "questions". He provided the proof needed and required. His birth cerificate was "CERTIFIED" by everyone that needed to do so. That wasn't good enough for some so they tried to change the question again.
No one is going to play that game for long so Obama let the courts settle it.
It looks like they have. But since it's not the answer you are looking for you again try to change the question.
It "could be" that the SCOTUS doesn't want any outcome, should they hear a case, to be challenged.
SOP.
technicality is what loses cases, so they're very important.
Post a Comment