But on your other point: FOX is 100% MSM! Which is why I don't know why so many of the folks up hear scream on and on about media bias. Sure these outlets play up to their respective audiences, but it happens on the left and the right. Fox is the #1 cable news network, it has affiliates in most cities just like the other networks, conservatives run talk radio, there are a ton of conservative-leaning newspapers/magazines, and boatloads of websites/blogs. Sorry for the tirade, but I'm just always flabergasted by the fact that folks actually think somehow the media prevents the conservative viewpoint from being delivered.
Ever since Glenn Beck left they have moved noticeably in that direction. Not mentioning Paul and leaning him out of the row of 5 or 6 candidate pictures on the screen for instance. Keep an eye out. And, Paul I would categorically say was in the top 3 of the Iowa caucus and the rest were categorically far behind across the canyon.
5 comments:
Yet another opportunity for the MSM to not mention Ron Paul! It's so noticeable now it actually draws attention to him!
Well, 7:47, it was not a split-decision between Romney and Paul. It was Romney and Santorum (who actually ended up with 35 more votes than Romney.)
Paul came in third.
And FOX is MSM?
7:52, good job pointing that out.
But on your other point: FOX is 100% MSM! Which is why I don't know why so many of the folks up hear scream on and on about media bias. Sure these outlets play up to their respective audiences, but it happens on the left and the right. Fox is the #1 cable news network, it has affiliates in most cities just like the other networks, conservatives run talk radio, there are a ton of conservative-leaning newspapers/magazines, and boatloads of websites/blogs. Sorry for the tirade, but I'm just always flabergasted by the fact that folks actually think somehow the media prevents the conservative viewpoint from being delivered.
Ever since Glenn Beck left they have moved noticeably in that direction. Not mentioning Paul and leaning him out of the row of 5 or 6 candidate pictures on the screen for instance. Keep an eye out. And, Paul I would categorically say was in the top 3 of the Iowa caucus and the rest were categorically far behind across the canyon.
Exatly, 8:33, he was "in the top three." As in, third. No one talks about the third-place finisher, whether it is Ron Paul or not.
Post a Comment