People can, and undoubtedly will, argue for some time about whether President Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. Meanwhile, though, there's a simpler and more immediate question: Does the Constitution allow him to accept the award?
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, clearly stipulates: "And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."
The award of the peace prize to a sitting president is not unprecedented. But Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson received the honor for their past actions: Roosevelt's efforts to end the Russo-Japanese War, and Wilson's work in establishing the League of Nations. Obama's award is different. It is intended to affect future action. As a member of the Nobel Committee explained, the prize should encourage Obama to meet his goal of nuclear disarmament. It raises important legal questions for the second time in less than 10 months -- questions not discussed, much less adequately addressed anywhere else.
The five-member Nobel commission is elected by the Storting, the parliament of Norway. Thus the award of the peace prize is made by a body representing the legislature of a sovereign foreign state. There is no doubt that the Nobel Peace Prize is an "emolument" ("gain from employment or position," according to Webster).
An opinion of the U.S. attorney general advised, in 1902, that "a simple remembrance," even "if merely a photograph, falls under the inclusion of 'any present of any kind whatever.' " President Clinton's Office of Legal Counsel, in 1993, reaffirmed the 1902 opinion, and explained that the text of the clause does not limit "its application solely to foreign governments acting as sovereigns." This opinion went on to say that the emolument clause applies even when the foreign government acts through instrumentalities. Thus the Nobel Prize is an emolument, and a foreign one to boot.
GO HERE to read more.
5 comments:
A bit off subject, If accepted, Obama should accept the prize in the name of the military and all the brave military men and women.
Then donate the 1.4 million to Wounded Warrior, USO or other military charities.
Sounds a lot like a bribe in this context. This may hold water.
Give me a break. I'm really glad there are sooooo many constitutional scholars out there. Why not read the constitution for yourself, really an impressive document not at all meant to be devisive. What next a post interpreting it unconstitutional to be black?
Based on what's written here, we need to dig up Woodrow and Teddy and prosecute their a$$e$!!!!
The ruse that they got it for past actions doesn't let them off the hook for taking something from a foreign govt.
Down with Woodrow! Down with Teddy! Hang 'em high!
(Hint to those who don't get satire -- this post makes you sound like a bunch of idiots -- again.)
Uh... 5:18, if you read all the words in the article, you will find that they got theirs AFTER they were in office, not DURING. This makes the point of law. DUH.
Reading ALL the words changes everything.
Post a Comment