Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?

As many of the sexual deviants are now being exposed throughout the media and now Congress sees this issue as a dire problem in need of legislature, should Bill Clinton be stripped of all benefits he and his wife receive as a result of his term as President of the United States?

Most should remember the fact that former presidents get all kinds of perks in their post-presidential life, including (but not limited to) Secret Service detail, a yearly salary and premium healthcare - all paid for by us, the taxpayers. Given that Clinton was impeached (only the second in US History) for lying about his tawdry affair with Monica Lewinsky, should he be forced to forfeit all the bennies he's been receiving for almost twenty years on our dime?

Why should we continue to pay for the Clintons' upkeep considering the fact that even Hillary Clinton - the supposed champion for women - ridiculed and threatened many of the women who turned out to be real victims at both hers and her husband's hand. She has claimed victims should be believed; however, since, several stories of how she terrorized these women have become tales of endurance by the women brave enough to come out and expose both Clintons' behaviors.

Clinton did eventually admit to his lies and his sexual predatory behaviors but being these crimes are long past their Statutory Limitations shelf date, nothing can be done legally to bring victims any remedy other than satisfaction that he no longer enjoys the lush life of post-presidential service. Should he have to pay back all the money he's received from this salary allotment including the costs for Secret Service and other presidential perks?

What do you feel should be done regarding the Clintons and the benefits they enjoy at our expense? Should they continue to live on our tax dollars or should those benefits be stripped and they be left to fend for themselves?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Him - lengthy incarceration. Her - public execution.

Anonymous said...

If they can go back 40 years against Roy Moore this is a no-brainer

Anonymous said...

He should have to pat back all the money for his and Hillary salary benefit plus all benefits he has received including the Secret Service cost and all perks. They should be stripped of all tax dollars and benefits. He was a sex offender that abused women and she violated national security policies which harmed the US.

Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that nobody is talking about the statue of limitation with any of these scandals. Did they go away?

Anonymous said...

618 was? He still is a sex offender. Since his presidential days, he's been going to Epstein's island where he can have all the underaged girls he wants as well as many excursions on the Lolita Express (Epstein's plane). He hasn't learned from his days in the sexual predator spotlight.

As for the question, Hell NO! We shouldn't be paying for the Clintons in any way. Let 'em twirl. They've got enough money from selling off uranium and America's intellectual properties. They don't need our money anymore. They also don't need SS Detail either. All Hillary does is treat them like crap so why should we have our Secret Service endure any further time with either one of these morons.

Yes, they should have to pay back every dime including the cost of services they've gotten as a result. If they go broke they can go live with their son-in-law (Soros's Nephew) in his swanky Park Ave. Apartment with Chelsea until a time comes when they all go to prison.

Anonymous said...

Clinton should lose his bennies for more than just all the sex stuff. He opened up the nukes to North Korea and sold our state secrets (at his personal gain) to China. They should indict him on treason for all this and it's long before the uranium thing with Russia. Both Clintons should be in prison or executed for their crimes against State. If it was good enough for the Rosenbergs it should be good enough for the Clintons.

Anonymous said...

Not sure what you're reading but there no was in my comment

Anonymous said...

I would think that rape would not have a statute of limitations....

Anonymous said...

They could forget taking away stuff from them if they would just look into the stuff they have done since then. They would be able to find plenty to lock them up over and then it would be a mute point anyway. But it is like they are guaranteed to be "prosecution free." What is up with that?

Anonymous said...

Billy Bob Clinton is the father of you can do whatever you want to a woman and get away with it. Now look at the Men that have been caught mostly all Hard line Democrats Billary supporters

Anonymous said...

I think the best punishment would be to LOCK THEM UP TOGETHER.