Pages

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Debate dredges up Clinton's defense of accused rapist, audio of her ‘laughing’ at case

When Donald Trump invited several women who had accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault to Sunday night’s debate, he also highlighted a case that may have been unfamiliar to many voters -- that of Kathy Shelton.

Unlike the claims of Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey -- the other women hosted by Trump -- Shelton’s accusations are not aimed at Bill Clinton. Rather, she alleges Hillary Clinton verbally attacked her while defending the man Shelton had accused of rape in 1975.

And while Clinton pushed back during the debate as Trump cited their stories, there is a paper trail to back up some of Shelton's account.

Shelton was 12 years old when she accused 41-year-old Thomas Alfred Taylor of rape. Taylor was defended by a 27-year-old Hillary Rodham, who took up the case despite saying she didn’t want it -- and called into question Shelton's reliability.

“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton wrote in an affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/10/debate-dredges-up-clintons-defense-accused-rapist-audio-her-laughing-at-case.html

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is the one thing that needs to get out to the public in a big way. I get that a lawyer has to defend their client, but we need to consider these items. She knew he was guilty. She destroyed a 12 year old with tactics that are not even legal any longer. LAUGHED about the case. Seems to have no remorse about the situation. This is one good reason that defense attorneys should not be president. They have a place and it is not the presidency.

Anonymous said...

Hillary often displays what's known as an inappropriate affect, showing that she has some deep shortcomings in her personality. She's tried to hide it all of these years, but the camouflage is thin and sometimes she goes overboard with false emotion.

Anonymous said...

You hit the.nail on the head. There's definitely something missing in this woman's personality, like a personality.