A kind of long read, but WOW!

Fred Reed (born 1945 in Crumpler, West Virginia) is a writer and was formerly a technology columnist for The Washington Times. He has also written for The American Conservative and LewRockwell.com. Additionally, he has spoken at one American Renaissance conference and currently writes for Taki's Magazine.

A former Marine and Vietnam War veteran, Reed is a police writer and an occasional war correspondent. He currently writes weekly columns for the website Fred on Everything. His work is often satirical and opinionated.

Reed notes that his columns are often provocative and calls himself, "an equal-opportunity irritant." His output does not fit into conventional political classification (although he does embody many libertarian philosophies); it includes attacks on feminism (generally the province of the right), George W. Bush (generally the province of the left), Israel (though not of Jews in general) and evolution (generally the province of religious fundamentalists).

Many of Reed's articles speak of a yearning for a simpler time and urge the reader to forgo the pursuit of money and comforts in favor of a cultured life of the mind. Reed currently lives in Mexico.

Black Power: A Done Deal BY Fred Reed,  October 30, 2014 

    As I write America waits, again, to see whether blacks will riot, this time in Ferguson.  Will they loot, burn, kill, and destroy?  The usual?   The police in Ferguson prepare to protect stores from looters, as rioters seem to regard their insurrections as shopping opportunities.  Will it come, we wonder tensely?  Will the destruction get out of hand, spread to other cities? 
    It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics.  Yet they do.   Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can't do.  Their power seems without limit. 

    Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces.  Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them.  Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks. 
    Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple or illegal voting?  The laws must go.  Do blacks not like Confederate flags?  Adieu, flags.  Does Huckleberry Finn go down the Mississippi with the Nigger Jim, or did Conrad write The Nigger of the Narcissus?  These must be banned or expurgated to please blacks who haven't read them or, usually, heard of them.  Do we want to prevent people coming from regions infested with Ebola from entering the United States?  We cannot.  It would offend blacks. 
    We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them - as virtually everything does.  It is positively astonishing.  One expects the rich and smart to have disproportionate power.  But America is dominated from the slums.  One might think that a single set of laws should and would apply to all citizens, and that things should be done without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, and that all should have the same rights and responsibilities.  It is, sadly, not so. 
     The dominance of the media by blacks is impressive.   If a white shoots a black to defend himself, it becomes national news for weeks, or months, and riots follow.   But when blacks engage in their unending racial attacks on whites, the media demurely look the other way.  The attackers are never black.  They are "teens."  Reporters who say otherwise are likely to be fired.  In effect, the thirteen percent censor the national press. 
    Much of their mastery has become so deeply ingrained as no longer to be noticed.  There is the DC Hesitation.  In the bars and restaurants of Washington, a man weary of an incompetent affirmative-action hire in his office will, before commenting to a friend, lean forward, lower his voice, and look furtively over both shoulders to see whether anyone might overhear: The DC Hesitation.  People don't even know that they are doing this. 
    Defensive behavior by whites has become nearly universal.  A sort of Masonic recognition-ritual occurs among white people recently introduced in social gatherings.  Is the other person, for want of better terms, a liberal or a realist?  Dare one speak?  One of them will say something mildly skeptical about, say, Jesse Jackson.  The other rolls his eyes in shared disgust.  The secret handshake.  Or, if the listener is politically correct, the bait is not taken.  In either case, blacks dominate political conversation. 
    So extreme is the power to control speech and even thought, that politicians have to avoid mentioning watermelons, or that neighborhoods of high crime must delicately be called "sketchy" instead of "black," though all understand who lives there and what is meant.  The avoidance of racial reference is not an even-handed if despotic attempt to oppose racism since, as we all know, blacks freely apply any derogatory wording they choose to whites.  In short, they rule.  Which is amazing.  
    The dominance extends to children.  When in junior high one of my daughters brought home a science handout with common chemical terms badly misspelled in a way which suggested a particular speech pattern.  "Is your teacher black?" I said without thinking.  "Daaaaaaady!" she said in anguish, having made the connection but knowing that she shouldn't have.   Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home.   And of course if I had gone to the school and demanded that the teacher be fired, it would have been evidence of my depravity and probable KKK membership. 
    The word "unbelievable" has lost all force.  Things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine.  Still, there it was: Don't expect a junior-high teacher to have the level of literacy I had in the fourth grade.  Instead, make it dangerous to notice their stupidity. 
    This is not new, and it hasn't changed.  In 1981, in a piece for Harper's, I wrote:   
  "The bald, statistically verifiable truth is that the teachers' colleges, probably on ideological grounds, have produced an incredible proportion of incompetent black teachers.  Evidence of this appears periodically, as, for example, in the results of a competency test given to applicants for teaching positions in Pinellas County, Florida, cited in Time, June 16, 1980.  To pass this grueling examination, an applicant had to be able to read at the tenth-grade level and do arithmetic at the eighth-grade level.  Though they all held B.A.'s, 25 percent of the whites and 79 percent of the blacks failed.  Similar statistics exist for other places." 
     Nothing has changed.  Blacks now control the presidency and thus, most importantly, the Attorney Generalship.  In this the staggering political power of blacks is most evident.  Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white politician would have had no chance.  He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south.  To effect this end he apparently will simply ignore Congress and the Constitution.  The people will not be consulted.  Laws will be ignored. 
     It is hard to imagine why he does it except from racism, from a desire to get even with whites by enrolling their country in the Third World.  A short-sighted policy, yes, since Hispanics do not like blacks and will soon be more powerful-but that will come a bit later. 
    Note that self-inflicted problems of blacks consume inordinate amounts of public and governmental attention, even though only blacks can solve them.  I might say, "should solve them," since they never have and we all know they seem to have no desire to do so.  Yet we hear about them endlessly. 
    Are blacks in Chicago killing each other in large numbers?  The solution might be to stop doing it, might it not?  While I do not wish these young dead, I can do nothing to stop them, and it is not a problem I can solve.
    
    Are black children growing up illiterate?  This gives me no pleasure, and I have various reasons both selfish and moral to wish it were not so.  But perhaps the solution is for their parents, or parent, to see that they do their homework, or even to teach them.  I cannot do this for them, and again it isn't my problem to resolve. 
    Why do I have to hear, endlessly, about the "achievement gap"?  Whether of genetic or cultural origin, it seems as immutable as Avogadro's number, and I can do nothing about it.  I raise my children.  They need to raise theirs.   
     They rule.  It is astonishing.