Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, March 02, 2015

Why Bibi’s Speech Matters

The emerging nuclear deal with Iran is indefensible. The White House knows it. That is why President Obama does not want to subject an agreement to congressional approval, why critics of the deal are dismissed as warmongers, and why the president, his secretary of state, and his national security adviser have spent several weeks demonizing the prime minister of Israel for having the temerity to accept an invitation by the U.S. Congress to deliver a speech on a subject of existential import for his small country.

These tactics distract public attention. They turn a subject of enormous significance to American foreign policy into a petty personal drama. They prevent us from discussing what America is about to give away.

And America is about to give away a lot. This week the AP reported on what an agreement with Iran might look like: sanctions relief in exchange for promises to slow down Iranian centrifuges for 10 years. At which point the Iranians could manufacture a bomb—assuming they hadn’t produced one in secret. Iran would get international legitimacy, assurance that military intervention was not an option, and no limitations on its ICBM programs, its support for international terrorism, its enrichment of plutonium, its widespread human rights violations, and its campaign to subvert or co-opt Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. Then it can announce itself as the first Shiite nuclear power.

And America? Liberals would flatter themselves for avoiding a war. Obama wouldn’t have to worry about the Iranians testing a nuke for the duration of his presidency. And a deal would be a step toward the rapprochement with Iran that he has sought throughout his years in office. The EU representative to the talks, for example, says a nuclear agreement “could open the way for a normal diplomatic relation” between Iran and the West, and could present “the opportunity for shaping a different regional framework in the Middle East.” A regional framework, let it be said, that would leave American interests at risk, Israel one bomb away from a second Holocaust, nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East, and Islamic theocrats in charge of a large part of a strategic and volatile region.

More

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Something tells me this won't be the most popular post of the day.Americans in general don't quite know what to make of it,myself included.

Anonymous said...

Why is it so complicated to you 8:27? Iran has VOWED to nuke Israel off the face of the earth when they get the nuclear bomb. Israel is our only true ally in the Middle East. Iran has also threatened us. Our Muslim president is the first in our history to openly stand against Israel. Appeasement to evil has never been beneficial to the appeasers (i.e. Europe before WWII).

Anonymous said...

Bibi bomb the crap out of those terrorists DON'T wait for the OUR MUSLIM SYMPATHIZER of a pt President to protect you its his plan to have u WIPED OUT.

Anonymous said...

OMG, I have said it over and over, Obama is the devil is disguise. Open your eyes people, 9:22 AM has it right.

Anonymous said...

9:13-It's not complicated for me.I was simply being creative in an effort to provoke comments.Otherwise this important post would have sat idle.

Anonymous said...

10:10, Oh, I guess the "Americans in general don't know what to make of it including myself" threw me off.

Anonymous said...

Israel Nuke em already.