Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, March 02, 2015

This is the best explanation of gerrymandering you will ever see

Gerrymandering -- drawing political boundaries to give your party a numeric advantage over an opposing party -- is a difficult process to explain. If you find the notion confusing, check out the chart above -- adapted from one posted to Reddit this weekend -- and wonder no more.

Suppose we have a very tiny state of fifty people. Thirty of them belong to the Blue Party, and 20 belong to the Red Party. And just our luck, they all live in a nice even grid with the Blues on one side of the state and the Reds on the other.

Now, let's say we need to divide this state into five districts. Each district will send one representative to the House to represent the people. Ideally, we want the representation to be proportional: if 60 percent of our residents are Blue and 40 percent are Red, those five seats should be divvied up the same way.

Fortunately, because our citizens live in a neatly ordered grid, it's easy to draw five lengthy districts -- two for the Reds , and three for the Blues. Voila! Perfectly proportional representation, just as the Founders intended. That's grid 1 above, "perfect representation."

More

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Take a good hard look at Jim Ireton's great voter plan for Salisbury. Same thing.

Anonymous said...

Ireton and all but one member of the city council have guaranteed that it will be a slam dunk for democrats in any upcoming election.
City elections are non-partisan only in somebody's dream.

Anonymous said...

This should be against the law, there are already lines drawn out, county line. Use those as the voting districts, only and that's it.

Anonymous said...

1 person, one vote. No districts. Just count votes.