Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, June 02, 2011

Obama Recovery Still Feeble After Two Years

Investors Business Daily

Economy: Without a lot of fanfare, the Obama economic recovery officially turned 2 this month. Anyone think we're better off than we were two years ago?

On Tuesday, a trio of reports gave fresh evidence that the answer to this question is no.
Single family home prices dropped in March to their lowest level since April 2009; the consumer Confidence Index tumbled to a six-month low of 60.8; and regional manufacturing is slowing. In the Chicago area, it fell to its lowest level since November 2009.

Yet if you listened to President Obama and his cheerleaders in the press over the past two years, the answer should have been a resounding yes.

Obama promised way back in February 2009 that his $830 billion stimulus plan would unleash "a new wave of innovation, activity and construction" and "ignite spending by businesses and consumers."

In June 2010, he announced that the recovery was "well under way" and that it "is getting stronger by the day." A couple months later, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner penned a New York Times op-ed headlined "Welcome to the Recovery."

And all along, media simply parroted the White House line, extolling every "green shoot" they could find, celebrating every time a handful of jobs got created, while constantly acting surprised by the ongoing "unexpected" bad economic news.

But the fact is that the Obama recovery is one of the worst ever. Certainly the worst since the Great Depression. It's so bad, in fact, that even 24 months after the recession officially ended there are few places beyond the stock market and corporate profits that have shown much, if any, improvement. A few examples:

• Jobs: The number of people with jobs has barely changed since June 2009 — up just 0.4%.

• Unemployment: While the unemployment rate has dropped a bit, the number of long-term unemployed is up by a third, and the average length of unemployment is now a staggering 38 weeks.

• Earnings: Median weekly earnings are down slightly between Q3 2009 and Q1 2011, after adjusting for inflation, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

• Housing prices: The National Association of Realtors reports that median price for existing home sales dropped 10% since June 2009.

• Gas prices: Pump prices climbed 52% over the past two years, according to the Department of Energy.
Yet, incredibly, Obama continues to escape blame for this sorry state of affairs. A Rasmussen survey in May found 54% of the public still blames President Bush, while just 39% blame Obama's policies.

The disconnect is stunning, but it nevertheless offers Republicans a huge opportunity, if they will seize it, to decisively claim the pro-growth label.

To do that, they first need to hammer home the fact that Obama's growth-smothering policies are solely to blame for the economy's two-year rut. Then they must focus on clearly needed pro-growth tax cuts and regulatory relief to turbocharge the private sector.

Sure, spending cuts and Medicare reform are important issues. But the millions of families still worried about keeping their jobs and their homes also need to hear how the GOP can get the economy moving again.

Source

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

He gave us Change

Anonymous said...

NOBAMA 2012.......

Anonymous said...

The economy was on a historic tailspin down and will take a long time to recover. Unfortunately Obama oversold the public on exactly what a pres. can do to correct a free market economy. Now he is paying for it. The economy will only gradually come back as corporations slowly invest their earnings, job growth continues, and consumer demand picks up. As for "growth smothering policies", I often see this tag line but never see specific examples. It's all about consumer demand and exports. The rest is predominantly red herrings.

Anonymous said...

I hope you libs are enjoying Obamas wacko polices, hows that hope and change working for you now!!!

Anonymous said...

Tax cuts to the rich has never produced jobs. Its been tested over and over and never been productive. Middle class consumer demand creaates jobs these are the people that need tax cuts.

Anonymous said...

I guess it is a Red herring that Obama stopped all American drilling in the gulf, yet orreres subsidies to Brazil to drill there. And the one american company that gets one of the contracts is tied to his administration. Sure smells fishy but not like a herring! Open your eyes and read, open your ears and listen. Don't just be led by the nose! We have been duped by all of our greedy leaders. Obama is just a Chicago Gangster on a binge! Worst part is we are allowing it to happen and are contry is in shambles! If we don't wake up he will lead us to the same travisty that is overtaking the european contries now. WAKE UP

Anonymous said...

4:13, your answer is a resounding YES because

#1 OBAMA didn't subsidize Brazil. The decision was made by a 3 Rep./2 Dem. GW Bush appointed board
#2 THe loan was to obtain AMERICAN-MADE equipment, meaning AMERICAN workers producing and selling goods

With an already blatantly inaccurate claim and alot of fluff, you're doing nothing but blowing hot air.