Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, May 23, 2016

Soros, Top Clinton Lawyer Lose Lawsuit Against Virginia’s Voter ID Law

Millions have gone into the effort to attack voter identification laws in numerous states

Hillary Clinton’s top campaign lawyer lost a challenge against Virginia’s voter identification laws that was fueled by money from liberal billionaire George Soros.

The lawsuit, filed early last year on behalf of the Democratic Party of Virginia, sought to end Virginia’s voter identification law, known as SB 1256. The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal court Thursday after a lengthy trial that saw numerous witnesses testify, dealing a blow to an organized effort by the left to take on voter ID laws in numerous states leading up to the 2016 election.

The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the law throughout the case by alleging it violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and said that it has an adverse impact on minority groups.

They also argued that the law violates the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by putting an undue burden on the right to vote of minorities and disfavored the groups because of their political views. The plaintiffs contended that the law was specifically put into place to suppress the votes of African-Americans, Latinos, and young people.

The federal court dismissed the lawsuit on all counts.

More

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Voting with ID doesn't burden anybody. So many things require an ID now, it's almost impossible to exist without one. You need ID to...

See an R rated movie
See a doctor (drivers license and insurance card)
Buy over the counter medicine like pseudophed
Buy ciggarettes
Buy beer
Get on a plane
Get on a train
Cross the border
Enter a club/bar
Apply for utilities
Rent/Buy a house
Rent a car or specialized equipment
Get credit of any kind
Drive a car
Insure a car

How can you argue damage to people if they can't vote without ID, yet you find it OK to deny medicine and medical care without an ID?

I'm sure there are plenty more.

Anonymous said...

Good work by the court!