Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, April 06, 2015

The New Proposed PMT Regulations

Here are the new proposed pmt regulations. Please look at the economic impact /benefit. Much of it refers back to the Beacon Study. If you want to stay in business, you need to read the document carefully and make comments.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

My God, what have we become?

All of this Phosphorous malarky came from those "fish kills" back when lib Glendenning was gov.

Do you all remember?

Remember the "Blue Ribbon Panel" the libz foisted upon us?

Remember Hudson Foods and how they were required to address mysterious Phosphorous issues?

Remember the libz saying Phosphorous runoff caused the fish kills?

Remember when other scientists said they found Phosphorous was not the culprit?

Remember .gov stopping their onslaught against honest farmers after finding out Phosphorous wasn't to blame?

That's right folks, the commie facist liberal pigs didn't stop, fact is, they stepped up their efforts to control.

You see, once those losers in .gov get a hand on you, they won't let go.

This Phosphorous hoax ranks right up there with Global Warming and Obamacare.

See any similarities?

If this PMI stuff is approved, say goodbye to the poultry industry on Delmarva, and it's multi-billion dollar impact.


Steve said...

Okay, I just went through and read the bold headings, ignoring the fine print, and find that there are absolutely no references to the following must have facts.

What is the current phosphorous runoff per whatever TODAY?

What was it 10 and 20 years ago?

100 years ago?

How much phosphorous is in the Atlantic seawater in ppm?

Is the raised level in the lower Bay due to tidal flows more than freshwater additions?

Are there river mouth readings of phosphorous ppm at every tributary history readings available to back any reasoning to the proposed regulations and controls???

Did anyone with a half a brain educated in Marine Biology even have an input on this gobbldegook? (other than administrative or political)

I'd love to hear the answers to these questions from the writers of this crime against the Eastern Shore.