Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, February 02, 2012

House Transportation Bill Drives Us To Deeper Oil Dependence

BALTIMORE — This afternoon, Representative John Mica (R-FL), Chairman of the House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, officially introduced a major transportation reauthorization bill. The overall plan for the bill includes proposals to open the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as well as the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, and to open landscapes in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to oil shale extraction. At the same time, it cuts all funding for biking and walking safety and cripples environmental review for transportation projects. On top of this, Speaker of the House John Boehner has said that he would attach approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline to this bill if it were not otherwise immediately approved.

Ewa Krason, Field Organizer with Environment Maryland, issued the following response:

“Transportation is responsible for one-third of our global warming pollution and two-thirds of our dangerous dependence on oil. But it doesn’t have to be this way – we can invest in clean, efficient travel choices such as public transit that will move our nation away from oil and toward a brighter, healthier future. These projects, such as expanded and improved bus and rail systems as well as biking and walking pathways, give commuters the chance to escape our heavily congested highways and choose smarter, cleaner transportation options that clean up our air and get our nation off oil.

“The bill introduced by Representative Mica today in the House of Representatives drives us down to the dead end of too many oil spills, too much air pollution, and destroying the places we love. It reads like a wish list for Big Oil, including:

Deepening our oil dependence: slashing programs for biking and walking safety, while continuing to underfund transit;

Destroying our most pristine wilderness areas: drilling in protected places like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and opening development for even dirtier, more hazardous sources of oil like oil shale extraction in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah that will endanger nearby drinking water while destroying landscapes and pumping out air pollution at truly alarming rates; and

Pumping toxic tar sands into the U.S.: Speaker Boehner has stated that he would attempt to force the approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline through this bill, further deepening our addiction to ever more toxic, high risk forms of oil.

“America needs a smarter, cleaner transportation future, not this destructive proposal that drives us down a road to deeper, more damaging oil dependence. The House of Representatives should reject this bill.”

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

“America needs a smarter, cleaner transportation future, ..."

The enviromentalists are right - we do need a smarter, cleaner solution for the future. The key word there is 'future'.

There will be solutions to these problems in the future (smarter minds than us will find them), but for the present, utilize what resources we have readily available to us.

Anonymous said...

Let's face it...we have too choices at the present time. 1) we can embrace the natural resourses we have here and with our immediate neighbors and drastically reduce our dependence on middle east oil. or 2) Continue down the "green energy" path that Obama has laid out in place and bankrupty our country. It's not a plausable source of energy yet..period! WTF!

Anonymous said...

What you folks don't seem to get is these are not going to "drastically reduce" a thing. America is near the top in oil production and is #1 in importing, yet this still doesn't quench our thirst. You are quick to point out that you can tax the rich 100% and still not close the deficit. Well folks, works the same way with drilling.

Not to mention, it is the average Joe out west (not some liberal hippie) that has been fighting shale oil extraction for many of the same reasons they have been fighting the KeyStone Pipeline; property rights and no one wants their drinking water polluted. Especially when resources are limited in so many areas.