Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, May 16, 2011

The Affluent Elderly

WASHINGTON -- When House Speaker John Boehner calls for trillions of dollars of spending cuts, the message is clear. Any deal to raise the federal debt ceiling must include significant savings in Social Security and Medicare benefits. Subsidizing the elderly is the biggest piece of federal spending (more than two-fifths of the total), but trimming benefits for well-off seniors isn't just budget arithmetic. It's also the right thing to do.

I have been urging higher eligibility ages and more means-testing for Social Security and Medicare for so long that I forget that many Americans still accept the outdated and propagandistic notion that old age automatically impoverishes people. Asks one reader: Who are these "well-off" elderly you keep writing about? The suggestion is that they are figments of my imagination, invented to justify harsh cutbacks in Social Security and Medicare on the needy.

Just the opposite. We see every day that many people in their 60s and older live comfortably -- and still would if they received a little less in Social Security and paid a little more for Medicare. The trouble is that what's intuitively obvious becomes lost in the political debate; it's overwhelmed by selective and self-serving statistics that cast almost everyone over 65 as being on the edge of insolvency. The result: Government over-subsidizes the affluent elderly. It transfers resources from the struggling young to the secure old.

To correct the stereotype, consult a government publication called "Older Americans 2010, Key Indicators of Well-Being." It reminds us that Americans live longer and have gotten healthier. In 1930, life expectancy was 59.2 years at birth and 12.2 years at 65; in 2006, those figures were 77.7 and 18.5. Since 1981, death rates for heart disease and stroke have fallen by half for those 65 and over. In this population, about three-quarters rate their own health as "good" or "excellent."

READ MORE …

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

How about some "significant" savings in the welfare and medicaid programs. I don't see that mentioned anywhere. Also a previous post mentioned the loss that social security took this year. With baby boomers getting ready to go on social security why are we paying less to social security as employees this year? They also don't mention stopping the "billions" that are being stolen from medicare daily by theives through medicare fraud that never gets investigated or prosecuted.

Anonymous said...

No one subsidizes the elderly in America. This is a lie.

We have been FORCED to pay into Social Security and Medicare. Then the Feds STOLE OUR MONEY!

Now they want to act like it is an entitlement. Like they are "taking care of us">

Anonymous said...

The elderly paid in.

It's their money.