Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Maryland's Mobile Millionaires

Wall Street Journal
REVIEW & OUTLOOK

Maryland's Mobile Millionaires
Income tax rates go up, rich taxpayers vanish.


Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is the latest Democrat to demand a tax increase, this week proposing to raise the state's top marginal individual income tax rate to 4% from 3%. He'd better hope this works out better than it has for Maryland.


We reported in May that after passing a millionaire surtax nearly one-third of Maryland's millionaires had gone missing, thus contributing to a decline in state revenues. The politicians in Annapolis had said they'd collect $106 million by raising its income tax rate on millionaire households to 6.25% from 4.75%. In cities like Baltimore and Bethesda, which apply add-on income taxes, the top tax rate with the surcharge now reaches as high as 9.3%—fifth highest in the nation. Liberals said this was based on incomplete data and that rich Marylanders hadn't fled the state.


Well, the state comptroller's office now has the final tax return data for 2008, the first year that the higher tax rates applied. The number of millionaire tax returns fell sharply to 5,529 from 7,898 in 2007, a 30% tumble. The taxes paid by rich filers fell by 22%, and instead of their payments increasing by $106 million, they fell by some $257 million.


Yes, a big part of that decline results from the recession that eroded incomes, especially from capital gains. But there is also little doubt that some rich people moved out or filed their taxes in other states with lower burdens. One-in-eight millionaires who filed a Maryland tax return in 2007 filed no return in 2008. Some died, but the others presumably changed their state of residence. (Hint to the class warfare crowd: A lot of rich people have two homes.)


A Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysis of federal tax return data on people who migrated from one state to another found that Maryland lost $1 billion of its net tax base in 2008 by residents moving to other states. That's income that's now being taxed and is financing services in Virginia, South Carolina and elsewhere.


States like Florida and Texas have no personal income tax, so the savings for a rich person who stops paying taxes in Baltimore or Montgomery County can be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars each year. Montgomery County, outside of Washington, D.C., is Maryland's wealthiest and was especially clobbered, losing nearly $4 billion in taxable income in 2008, with some 80% of those lost dollars from high-income returns.


Thanks in part to its soak-the-rich theology, Maryland still has a $2 billion deficit and Montgomery County is $760 million in the red. Governor Martin O'Malley's office tells us he wants the higher rates to expire "as scheduled at the end of 2010." But there are bills in both chambers of the legislature to extend the surcharge. The state's best hope is that politicians in other states are as self-destructive as those in Annapolis.

6 comments:

smitty240 said...

High taxes are only one part of the equation. Many people are becoming fed up with the immense infringement on their personal rights and freedoms by the oppressive dictates coming out of Annapolis.

Anonymous said...

How dare you rich keep the money you haver worked hard to get. I'm owed something because I was borned here and several many babies. What I'm supposed to do all day when my TV breaks?

Anonymous said...

What he said! Try building a chicken house in Maryland; it can't be done!

Anonymous said...

Maryland has become a low growth place and is on the verge of no growth thanks to the enviro-nazis, such as the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and locally the Wicomico Environmental Trust, who are pushing to eliminate subdivisions in the County and impose all kinds of costly regulations.

Things like higher impact fees and an APFO that Iteton wants for Salisbury won't help things and could stop growth altogether here.

Anonymous said...

And Atlas Shrugged!

Anonymous said...

Are you kidding me? "Impact fees" are the problem? Would you rather the taxpayers continue to subsidize growth? If you don't like high taxes, support impact fees that cover the cost of new growth.