Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Urban Salisbury's Plan

Mr. Albero:

After reading the Daily Times article about the Urban Salisbury Downtown Revitalization plan, I am disappointed. I sincerely hope that there is something meatier to this plan that what was published in the paper, but I have yet to see it, and based on the published information, I am flat out confused.

The new plan will create a total of 18 parking spaces – but that simply isn’t enough to really fill a restaurant, concert, or store. There are already parking spaces on the other side of the City Center, and they were not enough to keep the businesses inside afloat. So while parking is a problem, low-impact parking improvements are not going to help. A major revamp of the entire area into either a fully pedestrian shopping center or an area with substantial parking are the only feasible answers.

The Daily Times reports that this plan will create outdoor dining in the City Center area. There are ALREADY not one, not two, but THREE separate, if little-known, outdoor dining areas in that general area. One of them is a lovely garden seating area behind where City Bistro used to be, and back when Legends had that space, it was used for live music and cocktails. Guess what? Both businesses failed, not because there was not enough outside seating, but because there was not enough traffic in general. In addition, unless there is funding for better patrols, increased seating on the plaza may only serve to increase the already high number of homeless who utilize the plaza as a place to rest during the day. While our community needs to embrace the less fortunate and offer such respite, I doubt that increasing these numbers in that area will greatly improve the foot traffic into the stores and businesses along the plaza.

It will build a stage on the government building steps – why? Have the few performers that we have there complained of discomfort? Why not instead expand the Art Institute & Gallery, which long ago outgrew its space, or incorporate the old fire station into a performance venue? Urban Salisbury included plans for creating reflecting pools and a town square – why? We have at least two fountains on the plaza now, and they look terrible and are not properly kept up. And technically, if anyone wants to look, we have benches and trees in front of the old courthouse, across the way from the government buildings – we HAVE a town square. The Daily Times quotes the plan as offering, “A streetscape improvement that would create a unified urban corridor with increased trees and landscaping in some parts; traditional street furnishings, signage, curbing and traffic signaling; and clearly defined and separated vehicular and pedestrian ways.” Seriously? The overflowing trash cans are already there, thanks, there are already street lights, and the sidewalks are clearly demarcated.

I am deeply disappointed in the plan, and do not think it offers much to excite the general public of Salisbury about the downtown area. Something far more drastic and radical needs to happen. In addition, this plan is primarily just a ‘sprucing up’ of what is already there. Surely $5 million is not needed to tidy the neighborhood? I am amazed that given the current budget cuts, that the Council gave Urban Salisbury over $200,000 just to continue development of this obviously futile plan. Urban Salisbury says that the money will have little to no impact on taxpayers – I disagree – that money could be spent on schools, shelters, the local arts organizations, or general infrastructure. Instead, it’s going to pay for Urban Salisbury to remake what is already in place. This is the Emperor’s New Clothes, and it really should stop now.

I am a supporter of Urban Salisbury as an organization, and have met and hold the deepest respect for Urban Salisbury’s director. I am sure that this is what they felt they could realistically accomplish. But frankly, I think they need to provide a plan that is bigger, stronger, and more innovative than this one. I hope that you and the citizens of Salisbury will insist that they go back to the drawing board and use the $200,000+ award to come up with something better. Whatever happens to the downtown area, it needs to be big enough to make the locals feel compelled to go down and take a look. It needs to blow everyone away. It must, absolutely must, provide something to the community that isn’t available anywhere else. They need to pick up the downtown and really shake it up. Otherwise, the money will be wasted and the downtown revitalization will stall once again. I, for one, wonder just how many times the downtown can fail before it crumbles completely.

I know many will disagree, but if it will get locals really talking about what should happen downtown, then I am happy to sign my name -

Andrea Davis

Salisbury Resident

(& Former Resident of the Downtown Plaza)

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

downtown is dead and will always be! Give up!

Anonymous said...

Disagree?? No way, you hit the nail on the head !! Salisbury needs to look around at what supports it (college, hospital, etc..) and revitalize with those groups in mind. How about a Starbucks on the downtown plaza? Something the college kids will go buy. Something the lawyers will use who are Downtown for court. Come on Salisbury THINK for once!!!

Orsonwells said...

Great comment, Andrea. Might I suggest you ask to be invited to their upcoming meetings for your ideas; and heck, that goes for anyone that has ideas on what downtown needs. Their number is on their website, and I'm sure they would like to discuss fresh ideas with positive people.

Anonymous said...

FIX THE RIVER PROBLEM! Downtown will never have a chance until the river is cleaned up for good.

Mardela said...

Salisbury needs to stop spreading out and instead rebuild what is already there. If you want a true downtown, start re-developing from the center and stop spreading out into the county.

Why doesn't Salisbury visit similiar cities in size and find out what worked for them? Let's learn from others.

I would level the whole area and start with a smaller version of Harbor Place. We are an Eastern Shore city. Let's celebrate the water, the farming, the chicken. Tear down the old and start over.

Our court houses shouldn't be the center of attention. The GOB shouldn't be the main draw. We need good shops, restaurants, entertainment, arts, history and all of this in a clean safe environment.

Anonymous said...

Isnt that why we elected a new Mayor.

Anonymous said...

What about that plan to relocate the library from home plate into the far corner of left field -- parking lot 10.

grannydragon said...

Andrea and Mardela: I fully agree! A few bistros and a bunch of lawyers are not a big draw. Let's have some niche type stores and entertainment! Heaven knows the river is a mess, and the west end of the plaza isn't close to the best of neighborhoods, but certainly something could be done to make downtown a more vibrant tourist attraction.

Anonymous said...

Tourist go to the beach not Salisbury. If the downtown is to ever be anything again it must come from local traffic and local dollars.

Anonymous said...

Convert one of the buildings into a POKER house or a gambling mini-casino and "THEY WILL COME".

Anonymous said...

Having spent some time with the Urban Salisbury folks, I have to say while there are a few highly motivated individuals,the majority of the active members are the same old, same old.

They are not an invigorating or inspiring bunch. Alan Hope can just put you to sleep.

New blood and fresh ideas are needed. There is nothing to entice a business owner to take the RISK to open anything on Plaza. In this (or any other) economic environment, who is going to be so foolish as to set themselves up to fail?

Only a major, creative revitalization with a huge amount of investment can achieve what is needed in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

Read my lips.....FIX THE RIVER! Investment will follow. San Antonio had the same problem 40 years ago....THEY FIXED THE RIVER.

Anonymous said...

3:29
Agreed, develop the river between Rt 13 and Market Street inn on both sides. Shops and bar/restaurants along the river. Have a water taxi for people who want to get to the other end faster. It can also be used early in the day to clean up the river before visitors come. Is the old Daily Times building being used? Convert it to a mini mall with a free parking garage. Open the Plaza to two way traffic with diagonal parking during the day, and close it at night, so people have dinner outside without fear of being run over. Live music can play out in the street at night. Think big and dream the impossible, because it can happen. You can dress up a pig, but it is still a pig. Our downtown area needs some major reconstructive surgery.

Anonymous said...

Urban Salisbury seems to be no differnt than GM, Citi bank or any one else that got a bailout....hopefully someone is watching the money trail with these clowns. in these economic times i would hope that there is no funny business with taxpayer money...US needs to go away. more wasteful money spent...

citygoer said...

The downtown plaza could be the greatest place ever but the local consensus is that crime is a problem(which is correct). I dont go to the downtown plaza for 2 reasons. Absolutely nothing to see/do and even if there was the crime in that area with a higher saturation of ppl would be even higher than it already is.

I can see it now, spend millions on revitalization and then all the newcomers visiting can become victims. We have a crime problem, how bout we worry about that first.

Anonymous said...

While there are aspects you are right about, Andrea, generally this letter and some of the comments show a typical misunderstanding about how urban development survives and thrives. This plan actually shows much of the same ignorance. The misunderstanding is the typical 'gut' supposition that parking is a correlative factor to people shopping. Guess what. It isn't. In fact, the total of research about urban development and urban business survival, shows that the anecdotes saying "I would have shopped there if there had been a more convenient parking space" to be completely false. Upon privately interviewing (most) shoppers who make this claim in studies, the great majority admitted that other factors primarily lead to their selection of an alternate establishment. In no case was the primary factor actually proximity of parking spaces.

All that said, I still think we can increase parking downtown, but it should be through ONLY parking garages with surrounding ground floor retail and wrap-around upper floor units. If we want to do things right, there's a correct method and then there's completely out-moded, out-dated methods based on no research or market studies. If we're going to do anything, let's do it right. Parking, my friends, is not the issue. Expertise and energy are.