Former Attorney General Eric Holder has come out against proposals in Chicago and New Jersey to require fingerprint background checks of drivers for ride-hailing platforms such as Uber and Lyft. Why would President Obama’s onetime top lawman come out against regulation that is supposed to protect the riding public? Credit the intersection of two forces. First, Holder’s tony corporate law firm, Covington & Burling, represents Uber. Also, as Holder sees it, requiring drivers to submit fingerprints may “have a discriminatory impact on communities of color.”
I was surprised to read about Holder’s opposition, as I have trouble seeing Holder as a model for social justice. As deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, Holder gave a “neutral-leaning to positive” recommendation for the pardon of billionaire Marc Rich, who fled to Switzerland to evade fraud and tax evasion charges. As President Obama’s first attorney general, he was so stingy with the pardon power that political scientist P.S. Ruckman wrote that inmates seeking clemency had “a better chance of being struck by lightning.”
Besides, law enforcement relies on fingerprinting because it works. According to the National Rifle Association, gun buyers must undergo fingerprint checks in some states. California teachers submit fingerprints for criminal background checks. California drivers are fingerprinted. I get into my gym thanks to a fingerprint scanner and swipe my index finger to open my phone. Don’t tell me, I said to myself, Holder has joined gadflies who question the validity of fingerprints the way others oppose vaccinations.
Holder is no such animal. In a letter to Chicago Alderman Anthony Beale, Holder explained that while fingerprint checks are a valuable law enforcement tool, they “often do not indicate whether a person who was arrested was even charged or ultimately convicted.” Thus, mandatory checks “can prevent people from getting a job even if they were never found guilty of a crime.” Because black men are arrested more than white men, the policy affects men of color disproportionately.
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
9 comments:
Dag gone it, I'm sick of hearing this crap.
"Because black men are arrested more than white men, the policy affects men of color disproportionately"
If white men committed more crime this phrase would be different.
These so called educated nut jobs will do anything to jeopardize the safety and security of our great,brave patriotic law abiding citizens of this country.
Holder go back to your rat hole.
How many WAKE UP calls do we need.
What exactly is NOT racist anymore? Being black and beating up whitey? Being muslim and shooting gay people? Being the president and knowingly infiltrating our country with arab terrorists? Being a palestinian and spending all your energy trying to kill Jews?
Oh I get it now. White = racist, anything else = non-racist.
what we need are Holder's fingerprints when he is arrested
Just pretend for a moment that there is no color, then fingerprint everyone. That would be equality.
If Obama would declare a state of war on ISIS maybe our law enforcement could be effective in getting these terrorists before they strike.
Holder, who hand carried Marc Rich's pardon to Bill Clinton in the closing hours of Clinton's term, is probably trying to get Uber an exclusive contract for his next Fast N Furious gun running excursion.
No, Holder is racist...
Post a Comment