Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Who’s More Shameful, Hillary or Her Media Protectors?

Isn’t it just great that the liberal establishment views Hillary Clinton’s testimony in the Benghazi hearings in terms of performance art rather than substance? That’s the liberals’ way of telling you how much they value integrity.

It would be one thing if the mainstream liberal media said, “Clinton got caught red-handed in a number of lies, and not just on insignificant matters but on very important ones, but overall she held up well under pressure, and because of her performance, the hearings may actually be a net plus for her.”

At least that would be closer to honest. It wouldn’t be totally forthright, though, because if the liberal media went after her for her lies instead of helping cover them up, there is no way the hearings would benefit her.

In fact, conservatives have complained about the liberal media for so long that we tend to forget just how influential they are to their followers — liberal America and Democratic voters. If they would ever do the right thing — as opposed to selecting and slanting the news to promote the liberal agenda — America would be quite a different place today.

More

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The media must be brought down.

Anonymous said...

Tuff call.

Anonymous said...

who is scarier - Barry Soetoro or the people who voted him POTUS twice?