Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Why Iowa Shouldn’t Vote First Anymore


A week before Iowa’s January 3 caucuses, the outcome of the Republican contest is hard to predict: Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney all stand a chance at winning. But something else already seems clear: Iowa has blown its special claim as the first state to vote in presidential contests.
Iowa’s first-to-vote-status dates to 1972, when a quirk in Democratic Party rules scheduled its caucuses ahead of the New Hampshire primary, which had opened the presidential nominating process since 1920. Republicans followed suit four years later. Iowa’s political establishment quickly found that it enjoyed all the attention and economic activity that came with going first, and enshrined into state law a mandate that Iowa vote at least eight days before any other state.


Read More

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Like Iowa cares what you think. My family lives there and I can assure you that they don't!

Anonymous said...

It would be so much easier (and fair) for EVERY state to vote on the same day. Top vote getter gets the nomination! But I guess that's just too easy for the government to understand. Or maybe they do....they couldn't manipulate, rig or brainwash people into voting for who THEY want.