Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, July 29, 2010

EPA Puts ‘Environmental Justice’ Front And Center In Its Rulemaking Process

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a 55-page “guidance” to help its employees “advance environmental justice” for low-income and minority communities.

“Achieving environmental justice is an Agency priority and should be factored into every decision,” the document says.

The move comes 16 years after President William Clinton signed an executive order directing every federal agency to "make achieving environmental justice part of its mission." And Barack Obama campaigned on a promise to make "environmental justice policies a priority within the EPA."

The EPA says its new guidelines will help its rule-writers identify potential environmental justice concerns, and it instructs them to analyze the impact of their rules on low-income and minority populations.

The EPA defines environmental justice as the “fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, particularly minority, low-income, and indigenous populations, and tribes, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.”

The guide states that from now on -- in the process of developing rules, policy statements, risk assessments, and other regulatory actions -- EPA managers and staffers must first ask themselves, “Does this action involve a topic that is likely to be of particular interest to or have particular impact upon minority, low-income, or indigenous populations, or tribes?”

If the answer is yes, the rule-writers must reach out to the affected minority and/or low-income communities. One section of the guide explains how EPA rule-writers may have to make “special efforts” to connect with people who may be uneducated or non-English-speaking.

More on this here

4 comments:

Unknown said...

During the last presidential campaign, John McCain defined wealth as "$5 million dollars". Government tax policy makers seem to define it as making more than 250 thousand dollars per year.
I am not wealthy by either standard, and have only one friend who probably is.
Go ahead and take from them, why would I care?

Anonymous said...

Environmental Justice = Communism

Anonymous said...

Bill,
I wonder if that one person is your or anyone elses' employer. Well, then, when he is taxed more, do you think he will just give away his wealth to pay it or raise his prices and /or lower wages or workforce to make ends meet?

Mr. Duh

lmclain said...

So much for "equal protection" under the law. Maybe they could get some advice from NASA on how to reach out to other cultures.