Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

ABUSE OR FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION?

Section 8, article 1, commonly referred to as the"WELFARE CLAUSE" and article 3 , commonly referred to as the "COMMERCE CLAUSE" are used to project Washington's power over the States. In order to determine if this is abuse or following the powers granted by the constitution, one should examine Amendments IX and X to determine the intent of the framers.

Amendment IX - The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Welfare Clause - The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imports and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.

Commerce Clause - To regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and the Indian tribes.

The Congress has interpreted the "General Welfare" as giving it the power as authorizing federal laws governing health care, education, the environment and even the sex lives of the people. The Commerce Clause, which was intended to prevent trade barriers between the states has been broadly interpreted as authority for a host of regulations which have come to include the takeover of private companies.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the Nation and words do have meaning. It is for the reader to determine if these words are being twisted or adhered to.

Joel

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Government and mostly ther Dumbocrats with thier liberal judges, have been chipping away at the constitution for decades.
The buzz word is that the constitution is "a living document" meaning that the supreme court can change the intent of the consitution to suit the times.
That living document arguement is baloney! All the living document arguement does is allow the court to go around the constitution. After all, the constitution speels out the limits on the government, not on the people. "inalienable rights" means right given to individuals by God, that government can't take away.

Perhaps this country needs a Constitution reset!

Anonymous said...

The government is about to get a reset. You don't think the people are buying up guns and ammo for no reason do you? The ballot box has failed the people and they feel that all that is left is the ammo box. Once it starts it will be almost impossible to stop. I just hope those that engage in this have a plan for an interim government so that other nations don't try to sweep in at a time they percieve us to be weak. It's not a matter of "if" anymore people. It's a matter of "when".