Over the weekend, New York University professor Talia Lavin found herself under fire after questioning why the memory of 9/11 is sacred.
In March, Breitbart News reported that NYU had brouth Lavin on as a journalism professor after being fired by the New Yorker after her now-notorious false claim that a disabled veteran had a Nazi tattoo, so that should give you some idea of their standards over at the journalism department.
She’s their problem now I guess.
She followed this up with some attempt at a clarification, arguing that 9/11 couldn’t be “sacred” because it was not a religious incident.
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
4 comments:
It was not a religious incident? I am willing to bet that even non-believers were all of a sudden praying to God if they were trapped inside one of the buildings.
Has she ever heard of Gettysburg or Pearl Harbor ?
Obviously, this "professor" is quite ignorant.
911 was a ritual sacrifice
And Muslims don’t do ritual sacrifices
Think about WHO are into Numerology
Post a Comment