Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Ron Paul: "How To End The Korea Crisis"

The descent of US/North Korea “crisis” to the level of schoolyard taunts should be remembered as one of the most bizarre, dangerous, and disgraceful chapters in US foreign policy history.

President Trump, who holds the lives of millions of Koreans and Americans in his hands, has taken to calling the North Korean dictator “rocket man on a suicide mission.”

Why? To goad him into launching some sort of action to provoke an American response? Maybe the US president is not even going to wait for that.

More

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Trumps strategy is brilliant. His response to the enemy, Norks, goes back thousands of years.

S said...

That article just made me the dumbest idiot in the world, lol! Give me 30 seconds to forget I read that drivel. Offering to sit down at a table to a whack job threatening to nuke you? Really? For REAL?

Trump is doing exactly what he should be doing, and you can bet Mad Dog Mattis is doing his job as well.

If Kim gets stupid, well it will get stupid. If he's smart, he'll sit and hold his Johnson and his Armies will respect him for that.

Just remember, though, you can't fix stupid.

Anonymous said...

This should read KOREAN crisis. How does the worlds most perfect "reporter" make these mistakes? Please die. Thanks

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul. Pacifist. Surrender at any cost. No war worth fighting. He would just invite Kim Jung un to just come to S. Korea and take whatever he wants. If you just ask the USA nicely, we will leave and let you turn S. Korea into a communist country under your leadership. Ron Paul, pacifist exemplar.

Anonymous said...

7:49 It doesn't have to be "Korean crisis", "Korea crisis" works perfectly fine. Its the Vietnam War and the Iraq war, not the Vietnamese War or the Iraqi War. The conflict in Lebanon seventy years ago is known as the Lebanon Crisis of 1958, not the Lebanese Crisis. It implies that the crisis is about Korean actions but involves outside actors, whereas Korean crisis seems more internal. That being said, the English language is fairly fluid and the conflict in Korea in the 1950s is known as the Korean War. Either way, I don't think you need to tell anyone to "Please die". Thanks

Jim King said...

Haven't we tried the "sensible" approach for 25 years?