All comments are subject to approval by Moderators. Any off-topic comments will be rejected. Thanks for your cooperation!

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The Charlotte Riots: What They Are Not Telling You

As America awaits to see if Charlotte will burn for the third consecutive night, Paul Joseph Watson points out something troubling: thugs burned down a city because a black cop shot someone, yet meanwhile the mainstream media spun it, or at least tried, as as "peaceful protest." There is just one problem: violent criminals looting, attacking bystanders, attacking journalists, setting fires, smashing up cars, smashing up businesses and shooting at each other is not the a "peaceful protest."

And with all of these activities having been documented in the clip below, it is worth pointing out that:
Stealing and looting cash registers from local businesses is not a legitimate form of protest
A “protester” shooting another “protester” is not a legitimate form of protest.
Physically attacking reporters is not a legitimate form of protest.
Throwing rocks off bridges at passing vehicles full of families is not a legitimate form of protest
Beating up innocent people in parking lots because they’re white is not a legitimate form of protest.
Smashing up apartment windows where black people live to “protest” in favor of ‘Black Lives Matter’ is not a legitimate form of protest.
Trashing your own neighborhood is not a legitimate form of protest.
Looting the Charlotte Hornets team store so you can steal basketball merchandise is not a legitimate form of protest
Attempting to hijack cars and terrify their innocent occupants is not a legitimate form of protest.

What was unfolding in Charlotte - and may still be - is not a protest. It’s a violent, unjustified riot by criminals and thugs. The question is why is the media giving it legitimacy by still referring to it as a protest?

As Watson points out, if mobs of white supremacists were looting stores, setting fires, attacking journalists and shooting guns, would the media call it a protest?

What is most disturbing is that behind the pent up rage and thuggish violence, dressed up in the socially-acceptable package of "black lives matter" is the reality that white violence is the last thing blacks should be "protesting."



Anonymous said...

Put all the PC crap away (someday, hopefully) - and tell it exactly like it is.
The crowd is rioting for just three simple reasons:
1. To get free stuff
2. To get on camera.
3. To have some fun.
Number three should be on top.
I participated in the MLK, Jr. assassination riots, and the Anti-Vietnam riots in College Park.
Some of the best times I ever had as a teenager.
One more thing (off topic):
Do they give you the title of "Reverend" with every freakin' Happy Meal at McDonald's in Charlotte???
EVERYBODY that takes the microphone in that city and gets on TV is somehow a Reverend!

Anonymous said...

If white people were doing it they would ALL be arrested for hate crimes. Heck, white people can't even talk about what is going on without getting fired or worrying about their jobs. Look at the Seattle Mariner who is now suspended for saying, "These people should be locked up. Mentioned how blacks beat up a white when it was actually a black who fired the shot. Said BLM was pathetic and so was Obama. All of that is factually correct. Why did the guy get suspended? BECAUSE HE WAS WHITE. Only blacks can speak freely anymore.