Hillary Clinton claims her illegal email server was secure and no one tried to hack it.
The problem for her is her own State Department says she’s lying.
The Washington Examiner reports:
A spokesman for the State Department admitted Wednesday the agency was aware hackers had attempted to breach Hillary Clinton's private server.
"I do know there were hack attempts, but none of them were successful," said Mark Toner, State Department spokesman, at an agency briefing.
Toner was addressing questions about an inspector general report released to lawmakers earlier Wednesday that highlighted problems with Clinton's private email use.
When pressed on the fact that the watchdog report did not actually specify whether attempted cybersecurity breaches were successful, Toner said he "misspoke."
Source: AAN
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
3 comments:
I don't know when people are going to understand, if her mouth is moving, she is lying. Vote Trump.
I wish that specific IT related questions were being asked like: what type of IDS (intrusion detection system) was being deployed on the server and how often was it being updated and what method of encryption was used to ensure that all email was encrypted? With the latter being answered then how could she have possibly sent/received classified information to/from State Department personnel and other US Govt organizations? I know that where I work that we should encrypt anything that could have SBU (Sensitive But Unclassified) info and if there is anything with PII (Personally Identifiable Info) or ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) then it MUST be encrypted.
I would like to think that everything that the Secretary of State emailed would be considered SBU and above and that be traversing from one mail system to another that there is always the potential of having a "man in middle" intercepting and recording everything that is going on.
I believe that her email system has been breached, on numerous occasion's, and that they never had a clue that a professional hacker would have even been there. Hackers don't leave breadcrumbs unless they are either script kiddies, or they want the target to find out that they were there. To leave telltale signs would defeat the chances of visiting the server again.
Just a few thoughts. My apologies for boring you guys.
you know the russinas hacked her. I would love them to release her info for the public to see. That would be a check mate
Post a Comment