Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, May 09, 2015

Harvard Study: Social Security In Far Worse Shape Than Official Numbers Show

Over the last 15 years, the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Actuary has consistently underestimated retirees’ life expectancy and made other errors that make the finances of the retirement system look significantly better than they are , a new study by two Harvard and one Dartmouth academics concludes. The report, being published today by the Journal of Economic Perspectives, is the first, the authors say, to compare the government agency’s past demographic and financial forecasts with actual results.

In a second paper appearing today in Political Analysis, the three researchers offer their theory of why the Actuary Office’s predictions have apparently grown less reliable since 2000: the civil servants who run it have responded to increased political polarization surrounding Social Security “by hunkering down” and resisting outside pressures—not only from the politicians, but also from outside technical experts. “While they’re insulating themselves from the politics, they also insulate themselves from the data and this big change in the world –people started living longer lives,’’ coauthor Gary King, a leading political scientist and director of Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative SocialScience, said in an interview Thursday. “They need to take that into account and change the forecast as a result of that.”

More

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't welfare ever run out of money??

Anonymous said...

What did you expect. Clinton reduced the welfare roles alright. Put the non working POS on SS and why they are broke. It was for the working people not the welfare losers