As rioters rushed through the streets of Baltimore, torching police vehicles, looting local stores, and attacking police officers and reporters alike, some intrepid leftists justified the activity.
Marc Lamont Hill stated on MSNBC, “There shouldn’t be calm tonight. I think there can be resistance to oppression, and when resistance occurs, you can’t circumscribe resistance.” He added that the riots should be called “uprisings. The city is not burning because of those protesters. The city is burning because the police killed Freddie Gray.” Sally Kohn of CNN tweeted, “Looting is a real shame. But FAR MORE shameful is pattern of police violence against black community! Perspective, people. #BaltimoreRising.”
Baltimore’s riots have prompted a state of emergency in the city, as well as the calling of the National Guard. But the riots should also demonstrate conclusively that leftist myths about what drives race riots are just that: myths. It turns out that all the excuses given for the riots in Ferguson simply do not apply to the situation in Baltimore.
More
5 comments:
TREASON lock em up.. friggin commie nazi's libtards
And thats the problem.
I don't consider myself a leftist, or anything else, but I can UNDERSTAND people's frustration.
The Democrat media loves every minute of what they promote.
7:48 I understand it, too. But it is a two way street, and the Black Grievance Industry has discovered the lucrative racebaiting niche of playing one side off the other.
Post a Comment