8:53 and to whom are you referring? My first thought was, I hope you don't bother to get off the sofa and vote. You can barely form a relevant sentence to the topic
Anonymous said... 8:53 and to whom are you referring? My first thought was, I hope you don't bother to get off the sofa and vote. You can barely form a relevant sentence to the topic
May 24, 2014 at 8:57 AM
I think the comment was very appropriate. I notice you didn't comment about 8:18 and their Pulitzer prize winning journal.
7:02 - I do not disagree with 8:18's comment. So do you have a point? Is that what you wanted to know? I also found it to be a comment and not a journal. Your trolling style is obvious. Typical hate spewing redneck without any valid argument or valid point so you start slinging insults. Eff off or find something useful to say.
how many people did they interview? how come they only edited it to include those that did not know? how many people actually knew the answer? And you idiots suck it all up as if it is a sampling of reality. I would hate to see them interview this less than scholarly community. Could be a new comedy show on hbo.
Anonymous said... 7:02 - I do not disagree with 8:18's comment. So do you have a point? Is that what you wanted to know? I also found it to be a comment and not a journal. Your trolling style is obvious. Typical hate spewing redneck without any valid argument or valid point so you start slinging insults. Eff off or find something useful to say.
May 24, 2014 at 10:09 PM
ooooooooh! A typical Democrat response when they don't have an intelligent comeback.
Anonymous said... how many people did they interview? how come they only edited it to include those that did not know? how many people actually knew the answer? And you idiots suck it all up as if it is a sampling of reality. I would hate to see them interview this less than scholarly community. Could be a new comedy show on hbo.
Calcutta, India in 2002? Karachi, Pakistan in 2002? Denpasar, Indonesia in 2002? Islamabad, Pakistan in 2003? Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2003? Tashkent, Uzbekistan in 2004? Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2004? Karachi, Pakistan again in 2006? Damascus, Syria in 2006? Athens, Greece in 2007?Sana’a, Yemen in 2008 (twice)? Istanbul, Turkey in 2008?
Because those were attacks on U.S. Embassies that led to loss of life, as well,and in many occasions, Americans. Wonder why didn't here about those from 2001-2009.
Surely it couldn't be because of what party the President at the time belonged to...
21 comments:
uhhhh
wow that was great.... ancient Libyan word for - what difference does it make..
Fully prepped and ready for the world!
OMG.
Educated idiots on full display. This is why the liberals want everybody to go to college. A stupid society is easy to manipulate and control.
NEVER FORGET!
An uninformed public is easy to manipulate.
Sad, this is our future.
Stupid asses.Eveybody knows he discovered electricity.
and how many of you were involved in politics and current events when you were in your 20's.
None I suspect.
Another idiot Obama supporter!
8:53 and to whom are you referring? My first thought was, I hope you don't bother to get off the sofa and vote. You can barely form a relevant sentence to the topic
And the candidate that reaches this population wins!
Anonymous said...
and how many of you were involved in politics and current events when you were in your 20's.
None I suspect.
May 24, 2014 at 8:18 AM
I bet you voted for Obama.
Guess what Bozo, I wasn't "involved" but I certainly was educated and informed. There is a big difference.
Anonymous said...
8:53 and to whom are you referring? My first thought was, I hope you don't bother to get off the sofa and vote. You can barely form a relevant sentence to the topic
May 24, 2014 at 8:57 AM
I think the comment was very appropriate. I notice you didn't comment about 8:18 and their Pulitzer prize winning journal.
7:02 - I do not disagree with 8:18's comment. So do you have a point? Is that what you wanted to know?
I also found it to be a comment and not a journal.
Your trolling style is obvious.
Typical hate spewing redneck without any valid argument or valid point so you start slinging insults.
Eff off or find something useful to say.
how many people did they interview? how come they only edited it to include those that did not know? how many people actually knew the answer?
And you idiots suck it all up as if it is a sampling of reality.
I would hate to see them interview this less than scholarly community.
Could be a new comedy show on hbo.
They can't help it, they went to public school before college. Maybe even Wicomico County schools. They only teach them what they want them to know.
Now the ones above with anger management issues, you dropped out of school didn't you?
Come on, be honest. (that means to tell the truth)
A good example of why no one should be allowed to vote until they are atleast 30 years old.
Anonymous said...
7:02 - I do not disagree with 8:18's comment. So do you have a point? Is that what you wanted to know?
I also found it to be a comment and not a journal.
Your trolling style is obvious.
Typical hate spewing redneck without any valid argument or valid point so you start slinging insults.
Eff off or find something useful to say.
May 24, 2014 at 10:09 PM
ooooooooh! A typical Democrat response when they don't have an intelligent comeback.
Anonymous said...
how many people did they interview? how come they only edited it to include those that did not know? how many people actually knew the answer?
And you idiots suck it all up as if it is a sampling of reality.
I would hate to see them interview this less than scholarly community.
Could be a new comedy show on hbo.
May 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM
Just them you Democrat loser!!
Were they also asked about...
Calcutta, India in 2002? Karachi, Pakistan in 2002? Denpasar, Indonesia in 2002? Islamabad, Pakistan in 2003? Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2003? Tashkent, Uzbekistan in 2004? Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2004? Karachi, Pakistan again in 2006? Damascus, Syria in 2006? Athens, Greece in 2007?Sana’a, Yemen in 2008 (twice)? Istanbul, Turkey in 2008?
Because those were attacks on U.S. Embassies that led to loss of life, as well,and in many occasions, Americans. Wonder why didn't here about those from 2001-2009.
Surely it couldn't be because of what party the President at the time belonged to...
Post a Comment