This morning at 0830 the United States Naval Yard was attacked by a gunman dressed in military attire using an AR-15 rifle, a shotgun and a sidearm. He was more equipped than the 12 people he killed on the base who were not permitted to carry weapons on the base thanks to former President Bill Clinton. In 1993 the president issued orders that barred members of the military and their civilian contractors from carrying personal firearms on base. Even officers were disarmed under the law.
More
12 comments:
He did NOT have or use an AR-15.
He used a shotgun and two sidearms.
Well, dammit, it wasn't an AR-15 after all, but absolutely everyone who remembers that Sandy Hook was committed with am AR-15(NOT) and the Aurora theater massacre was an AR-15 (not) will remember this THIRD use of an ASSAULT WEAPON LOOK- ALIKE used for the mass carnage!(not) What a bunch of PROPAGANDA.
Does anyone see what I see here?
Will you get off your butt to do anything about it? Do you see what this will do against your children?
All they need is one more ignorant generation!
Strike down the privacy laws and concerned citizens can report these nuts before they kill a bunch of people.As it is,agencies like HIPPA cause people to fear for their jobs if they report strange or unusual behavior BEFORE a bunch get killed.Everyone keeps yakking about why red flags were missed.Eliminate the repercussions and people will speak up.
He only had a shotgun. Fact, no AR was used. Except maybe to stop that devilish Obama supporter.
If the military personnel had the weapons they should have on person (not locked away in a safe with no ammo) this would never have escalated to the tragedy it became. Thanks to another anti gun nut Bill Clinton.
He disarmed military personnel in 1995.
How's that working out for you liberals?
Meanwhile in the hood a few blocks over the Resident has lifted a ban on arming terrorists to legalize arming the terrorists in Syria with Mil spec AR-15's and stinger missiles among other military equipment.
Figured it out yet?
Progressives?
9:48 PM
You are repeating the false story that Clinton is to blame for disarming the bases.
In reality, it was Bush Sr.s deputy secretary of defense that "disarmed" the military bases.
Which isn't really true either, since we have never had soldiers walking around armed all the time, except in combat.
Military police are the only ones with that authority to be armed at all times.
Hippa only concerns medical personnel idiot. No reason why a neighbor or concerned citizen can't call in a complaint. Hippa was so if your medocal provider happens to know someone you know they can't diacuss your business. Or so ypur medical provider can't use your name in conmection with your issue so any joe schmo knows it's you and spreads your business. And as a matter of fact medical providers are required to report any suspected threats from an individual.so you wanna keep thimgs private .........keep your thoughts. I enjoy my privacy in every aspect.I guess you like the idea of drones buzzing your house huh? I swear some peoples children.
Thanks to another anti gun nut Bill Clinton.
He disarmed military personnel in 1995.
NO, he did not. AND, military personnel were NEVER armed at all times, except in combat or the MPs.
Repetition of lies may make some people believe them, but will not make them true.
"And as a matter of fact medical providers are required to report any suspected threats from an individual."
Not quite. Not "suspected" but imminent. While HIPAA has become a barrier to reporting-this is based on the an understanding that the vast majority of people struggling with mental illnesses are not violent, and in fact they are more likely to be the victims than perpetrators of a crime -it's individual state laws which prevent reporting.
11:10 just stealing a page from the progressive playbook.
And you're still wrong. It WAS Clinton.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
11:10 just stealing a page from the progressive playbook.
And you're still wrong. It WAS Clinton.
September 18, 2013 at 8:47 AM
NO, it was not, hard head.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
11:10 just stealing a page from the progressive playbook.
And you're still wrong. It WAS Clinton.
September 18, 2013 at 8:47 AM
FOR THE LAST TIME, I will once again PROVE to you and the rest, that Clinton DID NOT institute the policy of "disarming" military personnel and/or bases.
Below is a link to the ACTUAL directive dated 1992 and signed by Donald J. Atwood, Deputy Secretary of Defense.
He served under Bush Sr. from 1989-1993.
If Joe allows the link, and the first few paragraphs, you can read it yourselves. Or, heaven forbid, do your own search.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
SUBJECT: Use of Deadly Force and the Carrying of Firearms by
DoD Personnel Engaged in Law Enforcement and Security
Duties
References: (a) DoD Directive 5210.56, "Use of Force by
Personnel Engaged in Law Enforcement and T CSecurity Duties," May 10, 1969 (hereby
ELECTE (b) DoD Directive 5210.66, "Carrying of Firearms by
DoD Personnel," March 17, 1986 (hereby
NUVO 81993 canceled)
$.(c) Section 1585 of title 10, United States Code
1A (d) Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part A 108.11, 'Carriage of Weapons," current edition
"! ý(e) Section 1472 of title 49, United States Code
A. REISSUANCE AND PURPOSE
This Directive:
1. Reissues reference (a), replaces reference (b), and
consolidates policy and procedures for the carrying of firearms
and use of deadly force by DoD military and civilian personnel
engaged in law enforcement or security duties.
2. Implements the provisions of reference (c) that govern
the carrying of firearms by civilian DoD personnel performing
law enforcement and security duties, and references (d) and (e)
that apply to the carrying of firearms by DoD military and
civilian personnel aboard commercial aircraft.
I do want to listen to Clinton on Letterman.I think it's Monday night.Hopefully Dave will ask the right questions.
Post a Comment