Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, August 18, 2012

In Screwed Up News

A Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that a right to own a machine gun is not protected under the Second Amendment. Bush-appointed judge Milan Smith issued the ruling this week – joining the third, the sixth, and the eighth circuits in rejecting the claim that machine guns are protected under the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, the highest court in the land – the Supreme Court – doesn't concur. And Justice Scalia has even suggested in a recent interview that Americans may have a right to shoulder-fired rocket launchers under the Second Amendment.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

And we may need them soon, too. Of course, we'll be fighting the ones who will be trying ti "enforce" the laws! I'll stock up now and not wait for someone to make a silly "rule".

Anonymous said...

Anything you can hold in your hands is protected.

They don't want civilians to have anything so they can do whatever the hell they want to.

Anonymous said...

Of course, we'll be fighting the ones who will be trying ti "enforce" the laws! I'll stock up now and not wait for someone to make a silly "rule".

August 18, 2012 5:33 PM

And make sure it's a head shot and not center mass, where the body armor is located.

lmclain said...

Don't worry. They will ALL be head shots.