Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, June 06, 2011

DeMint is No Reagan, But …

In a recent piece for RealClearPolitics Carl Cannon discusses the pros and cons of Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) running for President.  The argument goes that conservatives would rally around DeMint but that he couldn’t win the general against Barack Obama.  There is even a comparison to Ronald Reagan.

First of all, DeMint is no Ronald Reagan.  There will never be another Reagan.  DeMint is DeMint.  That’s one reason why conservatives will flock to him if he chooses to run.

Jim DeMint, like Barry Goldwater, like Ronald Reagan, is the REAL DEAL.  While we will witness candidate after candidate attempt to claim the mantle of Reagan (because it's fashionable to do so in today’s GOP), they will ring false.  DeMint doesn’t need to do that.  His record, as well as his rhetoric, speak for themselves.

To quote conservative leader Richard Viguerie:

"These candidates rush over to the right during the primaries, and then tack to the middle in the general election," complains Richard A. Viguerie, the longtime conservative direct-mail guru. "That's what ruling-class Republicans do. We're not interested in somebody who says, ‘I'm opposed to increased taxes.' That's all rhetoric. Government has gotten too big. If you don't want to roll it back, you're part of the problem."

Unlike candidates like former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, DeMint’s rhetoric doesn’t change with the perceived electoral fashion of the day.  His record has shown that he would rather be voted out of office than compromise on a core principle.

IF DeMint decided to enter the race, and assuming he did so early enough to mount a credible campaign, it’s a game ender.  People may support candidate X or Y, but they will WORK to secure the GOP nomination for Jim DeMint.

Cannon alludes that DeMint, if he ran and secured the GOP nomination, would be a general election disaster.  I would argue that this isn’t the case.  History is 50 – 50 on the proposition.  In 1964 we nominated a true conservative and we went down in flames.  In 1980 we won in a landslide!  We haven’t nominated a movement conservative since.

One thing is certain, Jim DeMint will not alter his beliefs to accommodate the results of a tracking poll.  The last time we ran a candidate who did the same, we won big.

Jim DeMint may not be Ronald Reagan; but he is a 21st century equivalent.

6 comments:

Daddio said...

I'm keeping my eyes on Herman Cain.

As far as I am concerned, he is the real deal, and has already declared his intentions of running for President.

ConservativeAtheist said...

Reagan was a visionary... and he was brilliant. A true capitalist. While I don't agree with all of his views/opinions... this country needs another visionary like Reagan... some may disagree with me on this.. but Ron Paul is from the same ilk as Reagan. Candidate Paul is the best option for the Conservative platform...

Anonymous said...

ha ha, Ron "I wouldn't have went after Bin Laden in Pakistan" Paul is the best option?

Anonymous said...

1:34 ,not with someone as dimmly lit as you, but with special ops, and forces.Strength at home and abroad, starts with fiscal responsibilty, tact, and innovation. Nobody cares how nice your car is...

Anonymous said...

Anything is better than we have now. Obama is about 4 saddle bags short of a camel load.

Anonymous said...

2:18, uh, what?

I guess you did not see the interview where Paul specifically said he thought it was wrong to go into Pakistan covertly with our special forces to get Bin Laden. Do you guys even pay attention to facts or make it up as you go along?