The nation's system isn't quite as superb as Sicko maintains, but it's pretty good
Michael Moore's documentary Sicko trumpets France as one of the most effective providers of universal health care. His conclusions and fist-in-your-gut approach may drive some Americans up the wall. But whatever you think of Moore, the French system—a complex mix of private and public financing—offers valuable lessons for would-be health-care reformers in the U.S.
In Sicko, Moore lumps France in with the socialized systems of Britain, Canada, and Cuba. In fact, the French system is similar enough to the U.S. model that reforms based on France's experience might work in America. The French can choose their doctors and see any specialist they want. Doctors in France, many of whom are self- employed, are free to prescribe any care they deem medically necessary. "The French approach suggests it is possible to solve the problem of financing universal coverage...[without] reorganizing the entire system," says Victor G. Rodwin, professor of health policy and management at New York University.
France also demonstrates that you can deliver stellar results with this mix of public and private financing. In a recent World Health Organization health-care ranking, France came in first, while the U.S. scored 37th, slightly better than Cuba and one notch above Slovenia. France's infant death rate is 3.9 per 1,000 live births, compared with 7 in the U.S., and average life expectancy is 79.4 years, two years more than in the U.S. The country has far more hospital beds and doctors per capita than America, and far lower rates of death from diabetes and heart disease. The difference in deaths from respiratory disease, an often preventable form of mortality, is particularly striking: 31.2 per 100,000 people in France, vs. 61.5 per 100,000 in the U.S.
That's not to say the French have solved all health-care riddles. Like every other nation, France is wrestling with runaway health-care inflation. That has led to some hefty tax hikes, and France is now considering U.S.-style health-maintenance organization tactics to rein in costs. Still, some 65% of French citizens express satisfaction with their system, compared with 40% of U.S. residents. And France spends just 10.7% of its gross domestic product on health care, while the U.S. lays out 16%, more than any other nation.
GO HERE to read more.
9 comments:
Thank you Joe for this honest article.
Sicko is a very good film.
The last poll I saw said 85% of americans were happy with their current healthcare!
4:17, no, this article has it right.
For all it's headline getting places like Mayo Clinic, Hopkins, etc., the U.S. overall sucks at healthcare for all the wealth it has.
Other countries pay less percentage of income to their governments in income tax.
They have free health care.
We are striving for "price reduced" health insurance.
They have cheap drugs.
We have expensive drugs.
4:17 What poll was that?
Respiratory disease 31.2 per 100,000 people in France. What is that about, they smoke like crazy.
Anon 7:35
I was thinking the EXACT same thing.They are still allowed to smoke in most public places over there too.
In reply to Anonymous at 7:35 PM
Hard-smoking french people seems to be another myth about France (at least nowadays):
http://www.economist.com/daily/chartgallery/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13766483
Even if we add the 20% quoted in the article, France does not seem to catch up the US on the chart.
By the way, I cannot imagine that other (european, at least) countries are preserved from illegally sold cigarettes.
Post a Comment