Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, July 25, 2008

Ich bin ein tool for the NWO

This is quite the interesting article that I found today while
surfing the net....If we don't remember history, we are failed to repeat it.

Infowars

July 24, 2008


Berlin’s city center took on the atmosphere of a rock concert as more than 200,000 people jammed the German capital’s Tiergarten park to hear U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama,” reports Bloomberg. “Spectators chanted ‘yes we can,’ Obama’s catchphrase, as the 46-year-old senator stressed the shared ‘burdens of global citizenship’ that bind the U.S. and Europe. Beer and sausage vendors lining the park provided refreshments.”

I now understand a little more clearly how Germans were suckered by Hitler, said to also have had a knack for oration.

Problem is Obama is not running for office in Germany, although one particularly deluded individual carted around a placard reading: Obama For Chancellor. He had a flower in his hair… or at least the brim of his hat.

Indeed, there are “burdens of global citizenship” and under Herr Obama such burdens will only increase, as his wife indicated when she spoke of sacrifice. It’s time to run for the hills when members of the CFR talk about sacrifice.

Of course, it will be sacrifice for us, the little people, and not for the global elitists and their minions. But then we never learn, do we? Even Germans, who have no stake in Obama — not directly, anyway — or his selection as future decider-commander, are suckered into the patently absurd carnival — or as Bloomberg deems it, rock concert — atmosphere.

Somebody needs to tell the Germans — hell, somebody needs to tell the Americans — that Obama is a sock puppet for David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers, and the whole rotten and predatory financial class.

Is it possible any of the Germans gathered to celebrate Mr. Change realize the same banking interests behind Obama supported Hitler and were responsible for the immesne suffering of their relatives before and after the war? Hitler’s main source of economic support was the I.G. Farben chemical cartel and the I.G. Farben cartel was created by loans from Wall Street, most notably from the J.P. Morgan Group. It was all part of the Dawes Plan, contrived by the banker Charles Dawes and Morgan representative Owen Young. As described by CFR historian Carroll Quigley, this system was contrived by the bankers to create “a world system of financial control, in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” Hitler played right into the scheme, same as Obama will the moment he is selected. For more on this, see Antony C. Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.

But never mind. As Paper Collar Joe Bessimer realized, there’s a sucker born every minute, a quote mistakenly attributed to P.T. Barnum. Germans and Americans love a good show, never mind the consequence.

Of course, after eight years of Obama, there will be a chance to throw him out, as the now mesmerizing Mr. Change song and dance by that time will be quite threadbare, as always. “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers,” writes Quigley. “Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”

Don’t tell the Germans and Americans, though

41 comments:

Anonymous said...

So you're gonna throw Hitler, Kennedy, and Obama in the same pot? Classy.

Anonymous said...

Boy, Wymzie, you spend so much time putting down Obama that you must be pretty scared that he will win. Why not put some effort into the canidate that you are going to vote for and start telling us why you are going to vote for him.

Anonymous said...

It is outrageous that Obama is parading around Germany, Israel, and other areas of the world as if he is the presumed President rather than the presumed Democratic nominee. Your comparison to Hitler has validity.

Anonymous said...

9:29 She's a ward captain for her candidate. And if you've read the Tattler you'll have actually read her stance on her candidate and why she'll vote for him.

Chadwick said...

I regards to the comment left by the anonymous Kool-Aid drinker, there is nothing wrong with providing facts and evidence that support your principles and beliefs. It goes without saying that we will take any feasible alternative to The Messiah. The last time I checked, this campaign is for President of the United States of America. At least McCain is wise enough to realize that and is giving his speeches in the country of his constituency. McCain is also humble enough to not act as if he has already been endowed with the presidency. McCain is doing what he should where he should. He can't help if the media chooses to ignore his campaign and focus on nothing but their hopes and dreams of an Obama presidency.

Anonymous said...

Another reason on my list of "Why I won't Be Voting for obama"
Who does he think he is? He's not a President or even someone interesting enough to speak to the German people on others behalf....how arrogant! His speeches around the world are pompass and self-centered, where do we (as Americans) find "THESE PEOPLE???!!! Is there noone better? How very sad.....

countrygirl@heart

Anonymous said...

Wymzie puts up stuff just like yesterday that is not true. (Gi Letter) This is how the republican party works huh? Through lies!!! If you have truth about Obama, then put it up here, but if you are only going based on website junk then don't waste our time trying to recruit McCain by lying. Oh and Chadwick..... what a worthless peice of crap you are making the kool aid remark, YOU are what this country doesn't want here. Take your KKK clan somewhere else. (Nice republican representative)NOT!!

Anonymous said...

wymzie,
I fail to see the comparison and how Obama is supporting by the banking industry.
By the way... as a nominee, McCain also toured the European union and the middle east. It is just that no one cared.
McCain's economic policies are a joke and he clearly favors the wealthiest of the wealthy (is that you wymzie?)
McCain continues to bumble his way to some incoherent foreign policy decisions, still claiming that Iraq is the center point when it is actually Afghanistan. Obama has realized this all along.

The reason why you are all so afraid of Obama is that you likely agree with him and just don't want to admit that a democratic candidate is better than your conservative one. There are larger issues at stake here... The world is now flat and globalization is coming...America needs to prepare and McCain is in no way prepared to have a global vision.

The reason so many people come to see Obama is that the world still wants America to be the leader on the foreign stage. With 8 years of Bush, Americans and the world have seen this position crumble. McCain offers more of the same. Open up your eyes and try to come up with good reasons to vote for McCain. Please write them down and post them for me...

Anonymous said...

Obama's audience demonstrates what a powerful voice he will be for America... what influence he can project.

McCain will be a little man, just like Bush has been.

If America is to be great, having a great leader sure would help.

Anonymous said...

McCain is doing what he should where he should. He can't help if the media chooses to ignore his campaign and focus on nothing but their hopes and dreams of an Obama presidency.

Um, does anyone here realize that McCain brought this on himself? He made it the central focus of his campaign for almost a full month-- calling Obama's lack of foreign policy experience into question, and urging him to take this very trip. The lack of media coverage of the McCain campaign right now is John McCain's own doing, plain and simple.

Anonymous said...

anon 9:26
Unfortunately, yes they are in the same pot. Want to know more? Investigate Skull & Bones for yourself. You probably won't believe it if I simply tell you is in that pot! You really must go and find out for yourself.
Hint: Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker, John Kerry, so on.

Anonymous said...

McCain is too old to be president--although many 71 year olds are perfectly competent, he is already starting to show signs of his brain slowing down (the Iraq/ Pakistan border, anyone?). I think it would be great to have a president that people in other countries actually admire for a change! This country has gone so far down in world esteem under Bush/McCain that we can't even get anyone to help fight terrorists across the globe. With Obama as president, we will start to see cooperation with the American agenda of freedom, and not see the U.S slip further and further down the slopes to irrelevance. You want a strong country that is respected in the world? Vote for Obama. You want to continue to decline, economically, socially, and militarily? Vote for McCain.

Anonymous said...

Anon 12:32,

So Hitler was in Skull and Bones? Gee, I didn't know he even went to college in America!

Anonymous said...

VOTE RON PAUL

Wymzie said...

To all Anons who think that I am simply Obama bashing you haven't read a word I have written.

Theres is not a dimes worth of difference between the real agendas of these two candidates. I simply put up the post because Hitler was saying the same things as Hussein is saying and I found their support of him rediculous.

McCain is as much a part of this crooked establishment that has taken away our basic liberties over the last five years.

Go to this link and watch this, then ask yourself who ya gonna vote for! http://www.infowars.com/?p=3567

Anonymous said...

Hitler = Obama? Whatever. If thats not propaganda, I dont know what is. Wymzie has sunk to a new low.

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:05
In Germany it is called the Thule Society. Yes, it is an extension of the same exact organization. The Nazis had a skull, crossbones and the number 32 below. Skull & Bones has a skull, crossbones and 322 below. They are Nazis. Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker were in fact Nazis, admittedly. It is amazing how many Americans are so brainwashed, they won't even consider truth when it is presented to them because the information didn't come from the Main Stream Media - owned by the very people who are doing the brainwashing. But yes, Hitler was skull and bones. Do the research for yourself. Satisfy that little itch in your brain which says, "Is this outrageous story really true?" Look into it, please, this stuff is important.

Anonymous said...

Give me a break, Wymzie! Apparently, you don't read your own posts. You compare Obama to Hitler (using Hussein as his name, how clever), and earlier you posted a false story that Obama refused to meet with the troops, when he clearly did. You know what Hitler was really good at, besides mass slaughter? B.S propaganda. Kind of like the b.s you keep spreading about Obama. You are ridiculous (note the "i" in ridiculous).

Anonymous said...

It's ok, folks-- it's just an Infowars article. You should just keep flipping once Alex Jones enters the picture.

"I now understand a little more clearly how Germans were suckered by Hitler, said to also have had a knack for oration."

Ok, so the author invokes Godwin's Law in RECORD time, leaping straight to the Nazi thing, and even manages to point out that Hitler had a gift for the oratory. Did he really? What an insight. I can't believe nobody figured that one out sooner-- Hitler, a good public speaker. Add that to the history books, pronto!

Anonymous said...

George Herbert Walker Bush was a Nazi? You really are nuts. I don't even like the guy, but I find it hard to believe that a guy who fought against the Nazis was a Nazi. Unlike his son, GHW Bush actually served with honor during a time of war. Rub those brain cells together a little harder.

Anonymous said...

One more time:
Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker were members of the American Nazi Party in the 1930's. They worked at Union Bank in New York with the Harriman Brothers. The largest depositor was in fact Thyssen of the Nazi Party in Germany. The ensignias of the Order of Death (Yale's Skull & Bones) and those of the Nazi Military are identical. Both lay claim to Thule Society teachings. Perhaps it is worth one more rub of the 'ole brain cells, huh?

Chimera said...

Whats scary is all the blind faith people have in Obama-even scarier-the fact that he is going to win most of the black American votes for no other reason than his skin color.I agree with whoever said vote Ron Paul!

Anonymous said...

Hey blutojthetotmom , don't you think it's valid that African-Americans would vote for the first viable African-American candidate in record numbers? Put yourself in their shoes; for the first time in American history, there is a black presidential candidate who actually has a shot at winning. It's the first time that black parents can tell their kids, "See? You can be great too." Where's the issue?

Wymzie said...

People People Wake Up!

It doesn't matter if its obama or mccain, or hitler, or bush, they are all backed by the same international bankers who have THEIR best interests at heart. The bankers that are backing these guys have no allegiance to anything except power and money.
The article isn't so much about Obama being so much like Hitler as it is about who has his back and it the same people the same families!
Open your eyes.
They make money as long as the world is at war and countries are in financial crisis.

Anonymous said...

Wymzie,

If you put on the tinfoil hat, THEY won't be able to read your mind.

Anonymous said...

For all of you who are bashing Wymzie, stop it! She is great at writing down quotes and other thoughts. Unfortunately, she isn't much of a thinker, herself. She provides proof, quite frequently, that deeper thinking is best left to men.
"Surface is the disposition of woman: a mobile, stormy film over shallow water. Woman must obey and follow man to find depth for her surface. Man's rivers roar through subterranean caves. Woman feels man's depth but can't begin to comprehend it. Everything about woman is a riddle and everything about woman has one solution: that is pregnancy. Let woman be a plaything, pure and fine, like a gem irradiated by the virtues of a world that has not yet arrived. Let the radiance of star shine through you as you obey your man out of love....let your only hope be that you give birth to the ubermensch."
Thus Spake Zarathustra, Friedrich Nietzsche

Yes, like wimzie, I can give quotes. But I am a man and, therefore, have the depth to understand all thoughts to their core and beyond. Please, Wymzie, give your nice quotes, but don't try to go to their depths. Woman isn't equipped for understanding deep thoughts. It's like trying to go to the depths of the sea without a protective vehicle. Let man be your guide and protective sub-marine though the sea of deep thoughts!

Wymzie, I have told you a great truth. I hope you appreciate my kindness. I am very, very truly
all things to no people!
Thomas Augustus Littleton

Chimera said...

Anonymous 11:29
Your comment demonstrates my point exactly.He isnt even 100% black but because he is touted as the "first black presidential candidate with a chance" people will vote for him SOLELY on that basis.Thats no better than giving a job to a black person just because they are black,even if a white person is more qualified.ITs reverse racism and tokenism and its insulting.Who the hell ever heard of Obama 5 yrs ago?Nobody outisde of his home state.Unfortunately Obama and his "hate whitey" wife will do nothing but divide our country if they are brought into power.
And again,since people dont seem to get it-biracial and black are two different things.As someone with biracial family members it burns my ass to hear people label them as "black" just because they are not pure lily white.

Anonymous said...

I’ve never heard these thoughts about Obama expressed before, so please correct me if I am in error. First if the junior senator wants to unite us, why doesn’t he run a campaign stressing that he is bi-racial instead of black?
In trying to distance Obama from the Muslim influence that his father might have had on him, much is made of the fact that his father left when Obama, Jr. was a small child. Obama is said to have been raised solely by his mother and maternal grandparents, who in case you missed it, just happen to be the WHITE side of his genetic heritage! What kind of worthless, ingrate son of a bitch would identify more with the genetics of the parent who deserted him? He wrote a book, “Dreams of My Father,” in 1995. It seems to me that either his father had more influence on the young Obama than we are being led to believe, or he has more respect for a deserter parent than he does for those relatives who stood by him and raised him. I don’t believe the junior senator wrote any books praising the “typical white people” who dedicated their lives to him. Instead, he identifies with his black and Muslim parent who, if we are being told the truth, did little more than deposit some sperm, desert his wife and child and go on his merry way! What a MAN! Let’s write a book about him!

Three things to consider about Obama:
(1) Obama’s lack of loyalty to the half of his genetics who actually did something for him raises very serious questions about his ability to be loyal to a nation that elects him.
(2) Choosing to glorify and identify with a black and Muslim father who deserted him instead of honoring his white relatives who sacrificed for him, at least by proclaiming himself bi-racial, speaks volumes about his lack of judgment.
(3) If the premise that his Muslim father deserted him is false, and Obama Sr. did have more influence on the boy than we are being led to believe, well, that’s even worse. That means he is totally dishonest with the American public about his father’s role in his life and has more Islamic influence than any patriotic American could vote for in a presidential candidate.
Either the first 2 or the 3rd MUST be correct! It is dangerous for America to have him in the senate, but those with more sound principles of loyalty, judgment and truth can easily keep him in check. It is insane to consider him as fit to be our president.
Thomas Augustus Littleton

Anonymous said...

Well, blutoj, I would posit that people of mixed race suffer racism just the same as people who are 100% black. I fail to see what's wrong with black Americans being able to vote for someone who looks like them for the first time in the history of this nation. Again, put yourself in their shoes, and tell me you wouldn't feel the same sense of pride. So he's mixed, sure. He is also the first viable candidate in U.S. history to be of African descent, even if it is just half. And besides, if you didn't know who he was, and someone pointed him out to you in a Wal-Mart, and asked you, "What race is that man over there?", tell me, honestly, what would your answer be?

Another thing you seem to be worried about is his lack of qualifications. I don't understand how a Harvard Law School graduate (and first black editor of the Harvard Law Review...), with a history of community advocacy, and time in the Illinois State Senate, as well as the U.S. Senate (where he happens to serve upon the Health, Labor, Education, and Pensions Committee, the Foreign Relations Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee, among others) could possibly be considered to be lacking the requisite qualifications to be president. Give me a list of George W. Bush's qualifications. How about Ronald Reagan? It's a convenient argument to make, but it just doesn't hold water. And if you don't think so, I'd sure like to know what you consider to be sound qualifications.

As to your comment about affirmative action, well I guess I can't really respond to that, seeing as how it has absolutely nothing to do with a presidential candidate running in a hotly contested race, working awfully hard to get elected.

And, well, the "hate whitey" thing just proves that you're content to take incorrect information as fact, and that just says to me that no matter how much we discuss this, you'll never see it my way.


I want to be able to tell my children that we live in a country where people of all races and religions can aspire to the most wonderful things. I want black parents to be able to tell their kids, "See that? He looks like you. You could be president someday...". For the first time in American history, that could actually happen. Reverse-racism doesn't exist. Racism is racism is racism, in any form.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Littleton,

Had you bothered to actually read "Dreams From My Father", you would have the answers to every last one of those questions.

Anonymous said...

Sir or Mam,
I don't read trash.
I am commenting on how he is running his campaign as a black American, not a bi-racial one. We won't even go to his white hating wife or choice of churches. His campaign only stresses his "blackness."
Vote for him if you wish. I have no cause that would impel me to do so! If you think his actions haven't shown total disrespect to his grandparents and white people in general...well, again, vote for him. I think in the general election, white voters will see the truth and vote as a large, (60-70%), segment to save America from him, much as black America will be blinded by his black rhetoric and vote 90-97% Obama.
Thomas Augustus Littleton

Anonymous said...

Well, Mr. Littleton, I guess we find ourselves at an impasse. If you won't read the book you're railing against because you don't "read trash", then we can't have a reasonable debate, because you don't even know what's in the book. I find myself in the same types of situations with friends who rail against the Bible, yet they've never read a single word of it. My mantra around here is this: Take issue with a candidate/situation/person/whatever, just keep the conversation relevant, and know the point you're arguing. You've obviously made up your mind without knowing hardly any of the facts, so there you have it.

By the way, I am a sir. I post anonymously because I choose to keep my political beliefs private at work, and I know that there are more than a few of my co-workers who read this blog. I appreciate your candor, and wish that we were able to debate further.

Chimera said...

Damn Littleton are you new?I like your views....
Look,I have no problem with a black or biracial President-they cannot screw the country up any worse than the white men who have been running the show for over 200 years-but we have to look past race.Jesse Jackson ran for President and actually had a chance until he made those "Hymie-Town" remarks about NYC.Was he black?Yes.Would he make a good President?Probably not but if every black voter had voted for him based on his race AND he had kept his mouth shut (Hymie talk)he might well have been elected and then what?Instead of settling for the first promising man of color wait for something better!I would vote for Colin Powell or Alan Keyes in a heartbeat,because they are qualified to do the job.
Furthermore,it chaps my butt that Obama whitewashes (no pun intended) his background and allows himself to be billed as a "black candidate".My sister and her husband are a black-white couple and they have a beautiful daughter and they do not consider her "black" or "white"Unfortunately most of the outside world will look at her and think "black" but she is biracial,just like thousands of other kids.To deny one heritage and dismiss the other is unproductive and will only keep dividing the country.And I feel Obama as President would only further divide this country.If we really want to be progressive lets get a qualified black WOMAN to run.Now thats progress!

Anonymous said...

You didn't really address any of the points we have been discussing, bluto. You do, however, keep invoking your personal experiences with mixed-race relatives. I, too, come from a family with many mixed-race marriages, all of which have borne mixed-race children. I don't care if they identify as black or white-- it's not my decision to make. Something I think you're missing here is that we don't have to like the fact that mixed-race kids are instantly branded as black. It's simply the way things are in this country, and have been for hundreds of years. Moreover, I feel that being upset at the fact that mixed-race kids are recognized as black is, in itself, something we need to address. It implies that we don't want them to be disadvantaged by the stigma of being black, and that's what's at the heart of all of this. We KNOW that they will be, don't we?

Your comparison of Obama to Jesse Jackson, and Jackson's "HymieTown" debacle is way off base. There is absolutely no comparison to be made there. Jackson never made it as far as Obama has, and for good reason.

You also state that Keyes and Powell are qualified, yet you offered no rebuttal to my supposition that Obama is perfectly qualified to do the job.

Anonymous said...

Blutojthetotmom,
Thank you for your kind words, but did you also read my comment of 1:42? If so, thank you even more! I am not new here, I have been reading this blog from its beginning, just not commenting much.
To the polite sir: You are correct that I should read Obama’s book. Since he was not running for office at the time, it may give one a more accurate version of his views. In the current campaign, he is definitely over playing his black half. Perhaps he feels that he can’t alienate a group that will, in all probability, vote at a 95% rate in his favor. Although it is probably not a good sign that the Rev. Jackson wants to “cut his nuts off,” complete with hand gesture simulating the deed! I honestly don’t have a problem with a black or multi-racial candidate. I do have a problem with an extreme hate filled agenda like Rev. Wright has expressed with all the ugliness of a white, hate filled racist. I, also, DO have a problem with a secret Muslim in the White House! I’m not saying Obama is a secret Muslim. I’m just not certain that he’s not. I know he says he is a Christian; I have also heard of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Perhaps a more fitting analogy is the story of Moses. His mother was Jewish but hid him in the reeds so he wouldn’t be killed. Found and raised by the Pharaoh’s daughter, Moses lived the life of an elite Egyptian. However, at about 40, he reverted to the religion of his parents. We all know the problems that created for said Egyptians! I’m not saying Obama is an “Islamic Moses;” (Great title for a book, though)! I’m just wondering and concerned! Since you know the Bible, you understand the passage to which I referred and it's implications.

I have heard a few quotes from the book in question that that seem indefensible in any context and seem certain to draw a curtain of separation between Obama and a majority of clear thinking, moderate to conservative white voters. I will read the book and get back to you on that if possible. I’ve found that to best absorb any material I’m interested in learning; it is a major boost if I read the book and listen to it later on disc. It seems that giving the mind the same information through different senses intensifies the absorption. It doesn’t seem to matter if I read or listen first; the enhancement remains constant. So, I will take a week or so to do both, then hopefully be able to discuss the book & how it compares to what the senator is saying now. Of course, all our senses are unreliable and give us only perceptions of truth, so I shall, also, release my mind into the universe and seek revelation from the cosmos. This is how I came to the knowledge that I am very, very truly all things to no people!
To anyone who is considering voting for Ron Paul, get a clue! He may, indeed, be the best choice, but he has 0, that’s right 0, chance of winning. If you don’t think either of the candidates who has a chance of winning is the greater good, then vote for the one who you determine to be the lesser evil! Don’t just throw you vote in the trash can. Well, its still a relatively free country, throw your vote away if that’s what you really want to do with that sacred and precious opportunity!
Thomas Augustus Littleton

Anonymous said...

You won't vote for him because he might be a "secret Muslim?" But wait--I thought he was overly influenced by his CHRISTIAN minister? You guys are actually hilarious--you are so desperate to try to justify not voting for Obama that you come up with total nonsense! Just be honest--you don't know much about the guy other than what you have read on the internet or heard Rush or Hannity say, so you buy into contradictory and illogical arguments. Let me make it easier for you: just say you don't like the guy and you are going to vote for his opponent. Then you won't look so silly.

Anonymous said...

wymzie, still fighting the good fight baby, missed ya.

Anonymous said...

wymzie, told you alot of them were in denial, its like beating a dead horse, whats the point.

Anonymous said...

Anon 10:02
You hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately, you hit it on the left side, leading to the nail being horribly twisted, bent and totally worthless. Fear not; I will use the facts to straighten the nail you mangled and set everything Right.

My concerns about Obama are legion. His 20 year relationship with Rev. Wright & his white hating, America hating theology, doesn’t give me a real good, secure feeling about Senator Obama. (remember “God Damn America,” with all the traitors behind him on the platform slapping hands and shouting?.....not really the kind of “Christian” theology I could embrace nor put in the White House)! I believe a majority of real Americans will express the same thought and reason with their vote in November:)

His association with the proud terrorist, William Ayres, draws Obama’s judgement and plans for our beloved nation into much murkier waters.

The Muslim connection is my deepest concern, but his motives and lack of judgment in being friendly with the likes of Wright & Ayres are only slightly less troublesome.

His mocking of those American's who choose to exercise their rights as listed in the Bill of Rights by, "clinging to their guns and religion," doesn't seem like an especially noble quality in an American president...perhaps France or Russia would be a better choice for the senator to attempt satisfy his ambition.

I have to thank you for helping validate my concerns about Obama. As your comment illustrated, it is not just Islam I am concerned about with the senator; it is his fawning, friendly association with hate filled, radical, violent and terrorist factions in our society; Thank you so much for pointing that out!

There, I have dispensed my wisdom and set you on the Right path. I hope you are grateful for this free service to, you, my fellow American!
Thomas Augustus Littleton

Anonymous said...

Mr Littleton,

How very noble of you to offer to read the book to continue the debate. Sir, as this is the internet, be advised that as far as our opinions go, most of the time we will all be "all things to no people". :)

I look forward to continuing our debate. While I don't agree with your opinions, you argue your viewpoints in a very civil manner; a trait which is rare these days. To avoid any confusion, I will sign all future comments with my initials: "-k.w."

I wish I could get into more at the moment, but I have a birthday party to get to.

-k.w.

Chadwick said...

Nice retort from an anonymous blogger. Just for the record, the expression "Kool-aid Drinker" was coined back in 1987 by none other than former Mayor of DC Marion Barry. The expression has nothing to do with race, but speaks to the mindless agreement with the multitude. You sheep.