DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Attention
Sunday, March 24, 2019
OHIO: Convicted Felon Gets Six Extra Years In Prison For Profanity Laced Tirade Leveled Against Judge At Sentencing
LAKE COUNTY, OH (WOIO) - Manson Bryant is no stranger to the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, and he’s certainly no stranger to Judge Eugene Lucci’s courtroom.
According to prosecutors, Bryant, 32, has a lengthy criminal history dating back to 1999 when he was a juvenile.
He has been sent to prison at least three times for four different cases.
Court records show at least eight of Bryant’s criminal cases have been assigned to Lucci in the past decade, including his most recent case for a July 2018 home invasion in Painesville Township.
He was on parole at the time of his arrest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
F that commie judge.
Should have been led out to the firing squad
Love it.byeeeeeeeee
Could it be that he's one of those unredeemable people?
Six years of extra 3 squares per day, free college, free health care, free lodging, free vision and dental care, volunteer opportunities, etc, etc., all the things that he didn't have on the outside.
He's the definition of "typical" as millions are.
bring back the chain gang and see how many are repeat offenders!!
freedom of speech dont exist anymore? commie judge cant handle a few words? typical liberal!
9:24 you have never been to prison so stop spreading fake news
There is no 9:24 post
Look at england
Look at england
He got what he deserved should have been even more time. He should be sent to southern border to serve his time and never allowed to return. You don't like this country our laws and our court system leave for good.
How quickly they change their attitude when things don't go their way.
@3:41 Are they supposed to thank the judge for 20 years?
The judge should be more professional. If he handed down a sentence he should not be able to punitively tack on additional time because a person under stress reacts poorly.
The initial sentence was very likely the guideline so when this person goes to appeals they at minimum are going to take that time back and impose no more than the original time.
Post a Comment