I read these 4 statements yesterday from 4 different people that said these things 4 different times over the last two years.
After reading all four, one thing is totally obvious.
All 4 are by the same author! Same format, they are law remarkably similar, they all contain the statement the perp was a federal judge, etc.
I have seen large piles of BS while squirrel hunting and this one is of record size.
More
3 comments:
cor·rob·o·ra·tion
kəˌräbəˈrāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
noun: corroboration; plural noun: corroborations
evidence that confirms or supports a statement, theory, or finding; confirmation.
"there is no independent corroboration for this"
The key word is "evidence".
End of story.
You don’t understand how affidavits work. They’re drafted by an attorney, based on a witness’s fact statements, read over and approved by the witness, then signed by the witness. If you read the substance of any of these you would see how there are certain differences.
Reading comprehension is important.
I couldn't bring myself to continue to watch this circus act after 30 seconds of Feinstein's empty accusatory opening. For crying out loud, when will reason prevail?
Post a Comment