Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Wind: Still Two Or Three Times The Cost Of Conventional Energy, Whatever The Greenies Claim

Wind power now UK’s cheapest source of electricity – but the Government continues to resist onshore turbines.

That was the headline in the Independent this time last week. I’m not suggesting for a moment that you’re an Independent reader but suppose for a moment you were: what do you think your reaction might have been?

Mine, I suspect, would have been not dissimilar to that of the eight thousand readers who decided it was worth sharing – and indeed that of the two or three who used it to needle sceptics on Twitter.

“Take that, evil deniers!” I would have gone in my smug, Independent-reading way. And it would never have occurred to me to question the premise for a number of reasons.

1. It was written by the Environment Editor on a reasonably well-respected national newspaper. And people with responsible jobs like that don’t make shit up, do they?

2. The data came from Bloomberg New Energy Finance – “the world’s leading provider of information on clean energy to investors, energy companies and governments.” Well if they say so it must be true. Bloomberg – they’re kind of a big deal in financial information, right?

More

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for printing the truth but wish it had been written more clearly. Wind cost more and raises electricity bills. It kills the economy despite hiding more than 30% of its price thru tax subsidies.

Anonymous said...

There's an initial sunk cost, up front, to get through all the permits, land costs, engineering, right of ways and much more. Just like with solar. The panels aren't cheap, but over time the energy generated begins to catch up with the investment. It isn't an instant "free electric faucet".

The government, once again, needs to let the free market sort out the cost efficiency, and stop trying to interfere.

Anonymous said...

must have been co-written by LIBERAL JIM

Anonymous said...

It's not only cost prohibitive but it is not "green". Studies show there is no CO2 reduction in wind farm areas.