Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

How Colorado Cut Teen Pregnancy by 40 Percent

Over the past six years, Colorado has conducted one of the largest ever real-life experiments with long-acting birth control. If teenagers and poor women were offered free intrauterine devices and implants that prevent pregnancy for years, state officials asked, would those women choose them?

They did in a big way, and the results were startling. The birthrate for teenagers across the state plunged by 40 percent from 2009 to 2013, while their rate of abortions fell by 42 percent, according to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. There was a similar decline in births for another group particularly vulnerable to unplanned pregnancies: unmarried women under 25 who have not finished high school.

“Our demographer came into my office with a chart and said, ‘Greta, look at this, we’ve never seen this before,’ ” said Greta Klingler, the family planning supervisor for the public health department. “The numbers were plummeting.”

The changes were particularly pronounced in the poorest areas of the state, places like Walsenburg, a small city in Southern Colorado where jobs are scarce and unplanned births come often to the young. Hope Martinez, a 20-year-old nursing home receptionist here, recently had a small rod implanted under the skin of her upper arm to prevent pregnancy for three years. She has big plans — to marry, to move West, and to become a dental hygienist.

View Full Story from the New York Times

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sounds like a cheap investment to me. I believe I remember Governor William Donald Schaefer tried doing something like this with the Welfare/Medicaid recipients in Maryland and it was shot down by the Democrats.

Anonymous said...

12:40. What Schaffer proposed was mandatory birth control. This is purely voluntary. Huge difference!! I think that this is great data. Why are so many politicians and states trying to restrict women's access to birth control?

Anonymous said...

Of course 25 years from now when it is discovered that these devices caused cancer in women the government will be on the hook for billions in lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

wonder what the stats were for STD's...

Anonymous said...

An excellent idea. I'd like to see welfare benefits tied directly to the utilization of such a device. Not mandatory to have it implanted, but ineligible for section 8 housing, or only partial benefits without it. Or sterilization, male and female.

The return on investment would be extraordinary. If just 20% less illegitimate babies are born to people who cannot or will not properly care for them, that's millions of dollars in resources that can be saved.