The Supreme Court declared Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry anywhere in the United States.
The outcome is the culmination of two decades of Supreme Court litigation over marriage, and gay rights generally.
In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that same-sex marriage must be allowed under the United States Constitution.
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented, and all wrote separate dissents.
Alito wrote, “Today’s decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to keep or alter the traditional understanding of marriage.”
Roberts said gay marriage supporters should celebrate, but don’t celebrate the Constitution.
“If you are among the many Americans—of whatever sexual orientation—who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it,” Roberts wrote.
Scalia wrote his dissent “to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.”
“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a
majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact—and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves,” Scalia wrote.
Thomas wrote, “Aside from undermining the political processes that protect our liberty, the majority’s decision threatens the religious liberty our Nation has long sought to protect.”
President Barack Obama called the ruling a “big step in our march toward equality.”
More here
15 comments:
It's over.
God be with this country. These souls will have a rude awakening on the day of his returning!
So as an extension of this ruling:
Incest is now OK?
Polygamy is now OK?
Marrying minors is now OK?
12:01 No, it does not make any of that legal.
What a mistake.
Well as the Romans do so does America. We will fall just as fast. History always repeats itself.
12:14,
are you sure about that?
obviously you haven't been paying attention, or maybe you watch CNNMSNBCABCCBS?
The supreme court is now playing God, and has taken power away from the States.
If a few people get together and say they want to marry their daughters or sons because they love them, what's stopping them?
There are no rules now, no morality, no God given rights.
The Feds give us our rights now. We are beholden to whoever is running the show. Conservatives have been relegated to being the 'out of touch' people.
You're going to have to stand in line with the rest of the government cheese eating lunatics to get your sustenance.
The country is never going to recover.
Welcome to 1984.
1:46
Then you die, and the rest are left with what they created. Every older generational is not happy with what new generations bring (except maybe grandchildren). We think its a sad new world, but it is our progeny that has to live it this "Brave New World". One day they will have to leave what they created, but before they go, they will have to watch as their world is changed by newer generations.
It is how it should be. This is the world for the living. When we're gone, none of this matters. Don't read too much into this decision by SCOTUS. Let it be. It is now settled law. For the vast majority of us, i.e. normal (as defined by statistics and bell curves) heterosexual human beings, this means nothing to us. For homosexuals, it means a great deal. Let then have it. Live and let live.....
2:29
I don't have a single problem with gay people.
My problem is with the Judicial branch.
Now, gay people can walk into any church and demand they perform a wedding ceremony.
It's unbelievable.
Can you imagine a pastor or priest being forced to do such a thing?
And don't think for a minute it won't happen. The Feds will step in and threaten the church with tax burdens or whatever.
If gays want to get "married,", they should have their own "churches" to do it in.
What about businesses that refuse services, like bakeries?
This slope has gone from slippery to sheer ice.
3:15 you are literally 100% wrong. The decision absolutely does not affect a church's ability to exercise their First Amendment rights regarding who to marry - that is not a legal right bestowed by the state, merely a religious-inspired fluffery added on to the legal right that is bestowed by the church. It means nothing to the fundamental right to marriage; thus, it is not implicated by the decision today. Try again though, homophobe.
I DIDN'T have a big problem with gay people until they decided to go militant and started this in-your-face stuff, and started targeting Christians to put out of business.
You just wait. Even though there will be many options for them to get married, they'll seek out those who have a religious/moral objection and try to force them to marry them.
THAT is my problem with them. Their intolerant, hostile bigotry.. their war on those who disagree with them.
TAKE DOWN THE RAINBOW FLAG its represents Satan..look it up
3:15
Now, gay people can walk into any church and demand they perform a wedding ceremony.
Absolute lie. You need to deal in facts not lies.
4:34 You are absolutely correct. Persecution of Christians is next. This country is going to hell in a handbasket.
Call it whatever you want. It'll be interesting to see the divorce rate and hear about settlement details.
Post a Comment