The single-mother revolution shouldn't need much introduction. It
started in the 1960s when the nation began to sever the historical
connection between marriage and childbearing and to turn single
motherhood and the fatherless family into a viable, even welcome,
arrangement for children and for society. The reasons for the shift were
many, including the sexual revolution, a powerful strain of
anti-marriage feminism and a "super bug" of American individualism that
hit the country in the 1960s and '70s.
In its broad outlines, the story is familiar by now. In 1965, 93% of all
American births were to women with marriage licenses. Over the next few
decades, the percentage of babies with no father around rose steadily.
As of 1970, 11% of births were to unmarried mothers; by 1990, that
number had risen to 28%. Today, 41% of all births are to unmarried
women. And for mothers under 30, the rate is 53%.
Though other Western countries also concluded that it was OK for the
unmarried to have kids, what they had in mind as the substitute for
marriage was something similar to it: a stable arrangement in which two
partners, cohabiting over the long term, would raise their children
together. The embrace of "lone motherhood" — women bringing up kids with
no dad around — has been an American specialty.
More
1 comment:
It's what I've been saying all along.
If you want to just about guarantee you will be poor and living in poverty than go ahead, and aim for "single motherhood."
Post a Comment