Congress shows no signs of waking up to the threat of our debt and foreign creditors dumping their holdings.
IBD Editorials
Fiscal Leg Irons
Public Debt: After repeated warnings from government finance officials around the world, the exploding U.S. debt has suddenly become a major issue for foreign buyers. Maybe it's time we paid attention, too.
Worried about having too much U.S. debt on their books, a number of countries are cutting their holdings of American government and corporate bonds.
According to the U.S. Treasury, foreign holdings of T-bills plunged $53 billion in December — a record. More than $34 billion of it was dumped by China, which fell to No. 2 among holders of U.S. debt. Regaining the top spot was Japan, with $768.8 billion. All told, foreigners hold $2.37 trillion of U.S. government securities.
One month does not a long-term trend make. Yet, it's worrisome that as the U.S. is printing record amounts of new debt, the main buyers are showing a lack of appetite for what we're serving .
In recent months, Chinese officials have made it clear they're concerned about the size of their U.S. debt portfolio and wanted to shrink it. They're doing that now, with a vengeance. Others are doing the same, though not on the same scale.
But isn't it just a lot of accounting, moving dollars from one national ledger to the other? In a sense, yes. But remember: When we sell our debt, the interest is determined by the demand for that debt. When demand is low, issuers have to offer higher interest rates to lure buyers. That's starting to happen now.
Our supply of debt threatens to overwhelm the demand for it. In the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. could add as much as $13 trillion to its debt load — an unparalleled expansion, roughly equal to a year of our current GDP.
With this year's deficit expected to come in at $1.56 trillion and next year's at $1.4 trillion, the debt is piling up fast. We never worried too much about it, as long as it stayed a minor part of the U.S. economy. Some debt can even be healthy.
But in recent years, our debt-to-GDP ratio has exploded. Today, it's 94% of GDP, up from 83% in 2009 and a little bit more than 60% two years ago. By 2020, it will be well over 100%, according to government estimates. And it will soon take over our budget.
If foreigners ever decide en masse they don't want to hold U.S. debts — kind of like beleaguered Greece today — the U.S. economy would suffer from rising interest rates, a plunging currency and rampant inflation. We'd survive, but not without a lot of pain.
5 comments:
It's Bush's fault.
Right Chuck Cook, LMAO
It's both Rep. and Dems.'s fault. And if the voters don't stop falling for every little scare tactic and misinformed comment that attacks the other side of the aisle, it will continue.
Our only prayer is that the Ameircan people are awakening to the threat liberlism has and is causing our Country. We must seek out true conservative candidates for office in the November elections.
Hopefully, the T.E.A. Party people, Americans' For Prospertiy and other grassroots organizitions will continue to rise to the occasion!
11:44 and continue the same fiscal irresponsibility touted by Rep. in the past.
Vote common sense and leadership, not a party.
Considering there was a surplus before Bush, it's hard to argue there wasn't progress made towards the decreasing the size of the national debt before he was in office.
There will need to be higher taxes and a cut in government spending if there is to be any progress made. I think it's unlikely either side will be willing to risk whatever political capital they have at the polls on those claims.
Voters want more services (well maintained roads, social security, public safety programs, disaster relief) and want to pay less. It doesn't equal out, and isn't politially adventageous to run on that arguement.
A mindset change is needed in America, not a party change. Between federal entitlement programs and the interest on the national debt, the discretionary spending of the government is forced to continually shrink, and eventually will no longer exist.
It's a problem that has existed before, but the economic makeup of America and its industries has changed significantly, and it's probably unlikely we will be able to recover in a similar way should nothing change.
Post a Comment