A reader writes in:
Joe,
After watching the last Salisbury city council meeting on PAC14 and catching the mayor's state of the city speech, some things were just too hard to miss and I just had to write to you. I apologize if some of this sounds harsh, but I think I've just "had it."
First, the political ploy at the last council meeting of Tilghman, Smith and Comegys dumping all the budget add-ons into one big vote was the first transparency we've seen out of this bunch. They tried hard to set Campbell and Cohen as voting against motherhood, apple pie and the American way of life, as Cohen put it. How stupid does this "leadership" think we taxpayers are?
Second, Tilghman, like you posted before about Smith, is starting to try to claim the transparency theme from Campbell and Cohen by mouthing the word repeatedly. I don't buy it. See last sentence of previous paragraph.
Third, that same night Tilghman said she asked the public works director if he could find money in his department for the hydrilla treatment for Schumaker Pond, and Tilghman reported he said he couldn't. Whoops. Go check out Campbell and Cohen's website (www.onyoursidesby.blogspot.com). Cohen's got a proposal for funding the hydrilla treatment out of unspent zoo salaries. Why? Because the public works director said he could find money there if the council wanted to kill off geese in the park.
Now, I'm not dumping on the PW director here. He's new. Seems like a quiet fellow. And he didn't tell the council he couldn't find money for the hydrilla. The mayor said he said that. I guess she hasn't told him that speaking straight up to council members is a no-no. You can bet that little chat will be had now.
Let me make a prediction: The council won't take the proposal as an opportunity for unity as Cohen describes in her website post. They will find a way CRUSH it because they can't possibly acknowledge that Cohen or Campbell will ever have a good idea or be right even about directions to the bathroom. Then, the mayor will ride in on her white horse with and proclaim how she found funding for the hydrilla treatment to save the day. Or she'll give the holy grail to Smith or Comegys (likely the latter) to make one of them look good, like the Church St. bone she gave Smith and the Environmental Committee she tossed to Comegys.
Honestly, Joe, it's just all become as predictable as a TV sitcom!
The pattern is already well-established, like in the mayor's state of the city address. She mentioned everybody and their dog for their contributions -- except Campbell and Cohen. Then the mayor ad libs at the end (you could tell) that she'll have more to say later about how staff is treated. We know by that comment that she has a public flogging in store for Campbell and Cohen. I just wait and watch for when the next flogging is any more. We know it's coming.
In this same farce of a speech, the mayor talked about increasing citizen involvement, even creating work groups. Cohen and Campbell have been living, breathing, eating, sleeping citizen involvement, probably since birth.
But Tilghman's been thinking about citizen involvement "since January, and oh hey, I just remembered I've formed groups like that before and and uh uh...."
You get the picture. The pattern. No credit to your political opponents, criticize and smear them, but try to steal their ideas and methods as your own because you see the public loves them for what they offer.
One problem. Sincerity. Smith faked it once, but now she's no good at it because people know it was faked. Tilghman can't fake it any more either. Campbell and Cohen don't have to fake it. They've got the real deal. That's why so many comments were made on that last meeting, and most comments were in suppose of these two.
Anyway, Joe, I'm more of a reader than a writer, but after what I watched and read in the last couple of weeks, I just had to write to you. Thanks for letting me vent. Oh, and one more thing. Today I decided to look at what they call "the briefing book" for Monday's meeting. It's long, but check it out. Did you know that the city attorney has been overbudget three years in a row? You should do a story about that. If this city did the right thing in the first place, maybe our legal bills wouldn't be so high.
13 comments:
BRAVO!
Well said and welcome to the light!
And the public should know that the City has apparently incurred or committed at least several thousand dollars for the "Dog Park" that could be spend on the hydrilla problem.
Several thousand for the "dog Park"? Seems I recall it being something like $50,000. Yeh, she wants to spend that kind of money on a folly, while there are some real spending needs in this town, like the infrastructure of the whole town falling apart. Take a good look at the roads you travel on folks, as example, and then tell me we should go ahead with the "Dog Park"?!!
A. Goetz
Barrie's boy, Bassett, is trying to help her do away with that lovely old "standpipe" -- see today's editorial -- and some of the comments are good, including this one:
"Wrapped with something to resemble a condom, it would be a symbol for Salisbury's city administration."
Well it looks like another taxpaying, VOTING citizen has had the blinders removed.
BRAVO
Are you listening Barrie? Have another drink, it will help you sleep at night.
5:25--You have put into words beautifully the true soul and spirit of these 2 classy ladies. I have known Terry more years than I care to mention, and Debbie not as long, but you are sooooooooooooo right about one thing--they were born honest and have remained that way, unlike the rest of the Council and much of the city administration. I do not believe they have ever had any "hidden agenda" as others have claimed. They want total "transparency" and "government in the sunshine" as was promised by the rat who now sits as President of the Council. Thank you for expressing so eloquently what so many of us think of the 2 people on the Council who CARE about Salisbury. And Joe, thanks for giving people this forum to express our appreciation.
Wow.... I was gonna post BRAVO but somebody beat me to it! For a non writer that is a great piece of work, don't care who you are.
I also checked out the "On your Side" this morning and saw the post about Terry's suggestion to fund the hydrilla. Your right, this administration doesn't want people with better idea's and more knowledge.
Any good leader would jump on the assets of such worthy people on our city council. Notice I used the term "Good Leader." Bravo again, just because I can~!
D & T made the rest of the council and administration look like chimps picking fleas off each other at the last council meeting. Hope to see you Monday Night.....
GREAT POST!!!
Send it to the daily rag & sign it gary, now that mr. no nuts has become so demure...
Now that Wilber lives there, Barrie can get him to cut that hydrilla with his riding mower.
mr. goetz,
and don't forget the bike trails & skateboards. the dog park appeared to be just another "dunn deal" when it came before council.
now what to do about M R runnin' for mare, no nuts comegys.
notice how the may'r wants the queries from the only ladies on council to be ahead of time, much like they want their information to prepare for the meets.
she said that more than once during that session, stealing the premise (gasp) from them.
Post a Comment