Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, March 27, 2008

110 Years Later....United States vs. Wong Kim Ark

A historic decision was handed down by the Supreme Court on March 28,1898, a decision that decreed any child born inside the United States to foreign parents who were NOT American citizens was indeed a U.S. citizen by virtue of birth.While it might have seemed like a good idea at the time,over a century later it is an economic,societal and diplomatic disaster.School systems,social services and other community resources are overburdened by the very large families of illegal immigrants who are taking advantage of Americas benevolence.They know that any children born inside American borders is an "instant citizen" and therefore qualifies them for food stamps,cash assistance,Medicaid and a host of other programs.Their children are also entitled to a public education and since many of them do not speak English,all of these taxpayer funded agencies have to hire extra people who can translate.A friend of mine who lives in a distant state reported that in her school district,public Pre-K is strictly limited to a)children in a home under the poverty level or b) children who do NOT speak English!Her tax dollars are good enough to support Pre-K instruction but her child is not welcome!The only alternative is expensive private school Pre-K or pre-school.Similar tales come in from those who have worked in a welfare office or hospital or clinic.Since Medicaid picks up the tab for prenatal care and childbirth,there is no incentive NOT to keep breeding more "citizens".As a country,when do we stand up and say we have had enough?Considering the horrific treatment that Chinese and other Asian immigrants received in the 1800's I can understand why it happened.(the decision)Although they worked long hours building railroads and working in mines among other things,they were severely discriminated against.Like the immigrants of 2008,they did jobs that were deemed too dangerous or difficult for anyone else.Unlike 2008 immigrants,these were proud immigrants who wanted to adapt to their new country,rather than force it to adapt to them.They were anxious and grateful for the opportunity they perceived to be here and they struggled to learn the language and understand the American culture.They did not demand to have Chinese or Cantonese translators-or run through the streets waving Peoples Republic of China flags and flaunting their illegal status.They paid their own way because there was no welfare back then.Older,more established immigrants networked to help new arrivals from their homeland to assimilate and survive.So the Supreme court could not possibly foresee the impact the decision would have decades later.As a Mother,the reality of this decision hits my heart-The Baltimore Sun did a story not too long ago about the American-born children of illegal immigrants who have had one or both parents deported.What happens to these young Americans when their father is picked up by INS?Unfortunately this issue never came into play when the historic decision was made in 1898.What do we do about it now?Do we give immunity to the parents,even though they are illegal,in an attempt to preserve families?Do we deport the minor children with the parents,although they are Americans just like you or I?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you for opening a very touchy subject. I would like to say that I trusted anyone to be working on the subject, but we have a United States Congress full of malingerers, and people of bad moral character, and for some reason no one is willing to vote them out of office.

I have no representation, from the body of my legislature. Lobby groups are the "citizens" of this country, not the taxpayers.

I have observed countless "babes in arms" at every shopping facility in the Salisbury area, and it's environs. Those babies are citizens, while their parents are not. It is more than obvious to a casual observer. They are a "ticket" to our way of life. Who can blame anyone for wanting the freedoms, who can blame anyone for wanting a job?

However, those precious ones are being exploited, they were brought into the world selfishly and used as a "ticket" to freedom.

I do not believe that we should continue to pay for them, sure, they are citizens, but, we need to be clear that we simply cannot afford any more "guests" that do not pay their way. I would like to have some way to give all the services to folks, but I cannot afford gas for my vehicle, I cannot afford to do a lot of the things I could do 2 years ago. I am on a fixed income.

The congress, our State Legislature, owe the citizens of the State a better way to go. They are being paid, again, for nothing. They should make legislation that would solve the problem.

I am certain that with a group of folks from Wicomico county we could write legislation that would get rid of the burden of illegals, and protect those who cannot protect themselves. Why can't our elected officials do anything.

Anonymous said...

SHIP EM OUT!

Anonymous said...

Since the parents made no effort to become legal US citizens, one can argue that the parents have neglected their duty to protect their child who is legal citizen. Due to this neglect the children shall be put in foster care and the parent’s deported if they don’t become legal or have a criminal record. This would deter that behavior.

Bob said...

Totmom....

Are you sure this is totally accurate? I was of the understanding that the law granting immediate citizenship to the children born here of foriegn parents only applied if the parents were here legally. There are many people here legally but are still not U.S. citizens.

I would like to know if the law relates to ANYONE born here, regardless of the legal status of the parents presence here.

Can you look into that? That would make a HUGE difference.

Anonymous said...

In response to the comment of grand dad, the answer is very simple. The 14th Amendment provides that "All persons born...in the United States...are citizens of the United States.

Chimera said...

Thanks Art!You answered Grandad before I did!
Too bad this particular Amendment will not be repealed anytime soon-we are reaching a crisis situation as far as illegal immigration goes.

Anonymous said...

"Since the parents made no effort to become legal US citizens, one can argue that the parents have neglected their duty to protect their child who is legal citizen. Due to this neglect the children shall be put in foster care and the parent’s deported if they don’t become legal or have a criminal record. This would deter that behavior."

You can't be serious. First, how do you know that they haven't made steps to become legal citizens- how do you prove it? It takes a long time to get permission to legallly reside in the US or work here- most decide to take their chances and come illegally. Once here, it takes time and money (to pay fines for illegal entry as well as required immunizations) to become legal. Second, this doesn't exactly meet the legal definition of neglect- and if you change it, there might be other changes to child protection laws that you think are more intrusive than necessary. Third- where on earth do you suggest that we get the money for this?? The child welfare system in America is heavily burdened- there are a lot of children in foster care just in the state of Maryland, and there is an equally high number of children in Maryland awaiting permanent adoptive homes. You have to pay foster parents/group homes to care for these kids, and you have to pay social workers to oversee those cases. Children in foster care get MA, so that's another cost that must be considered. And don't forget about the court oversight- requiring judges, lawyers, advocates, etc.

In this country, there is a belief in the right of a parent to raise their child. Parents of children in foster care receive extensive services to achieve reunification- this is mandated by the law (otherwise, there'd be a whole lot more kids awaiting adoption)- so we'd have to pay for that too.

I'm all for changes in immigration legislation- I think something definitely needs to be done. But, I don't like the idea of so quickly assuming responsibility for children of parents here illegaly. I think it would lead to a whole new set of unsavory circumstances. Plus, I don't think it would be much of a deterrent. For me, the thought of jail would be a deterrent, but look at all those that regularly engage in criminal behavior.

Bob said...

art,

I appreciate that. I'd never taken the time to look into that for myself. I think I read what I posted on a blog somewhere. The 14th amendment makes it clear.