A federal appeals court thinks there’s no difference between a man’s bare chest and a woman’s naked chest—and, despite what some feminists are saying, that’s bad news for women.
Ignoring the real biological differences between men and women strips women of our rights to physical privacy. And even as more and more women are speaking out about their experiences of sexual harassment, the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit—that’s likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court—tells them that those experiences are not legitimate.
As part of the #MeToo movement, women have shared wrenching personal stories of sexual harassment, ranging from unwelcome comments and touches to the extreme of rape.
Thousands of women have related stories of the trauma they experienced because of unwelcome looks, comments, and physical contact with their breasts. These women know, innately, that their breasts are intimate, sexual parts of their bodies, and when their breasts aren’t respected, women suffer serious emotional harm.
But on Feb. 15, the federal court upheld an injunction that prohibits the city of Fort Collins, Colorado, from enforcing a law that prohibits females 10 years old and older from going topless in public.
More
10 comments:
Joe Biden is gonna love campaigning in Ft Collins.
We need this in Ocean City, something to look at besides stupid seagulls!
They want equality so let them have it. I don't mind looking at the hooters.
So you want to see 10 year old girls top less?!? Disgusting
Just the tip of the iceberg....
It can get pretty cold out in Colorado, it will be "nippy" in the fall.
Do they go topless to work or what. Not sure Colorado has sandy beaches. Maybe boating?
and when there breasts are grabbed or brushed against they will have your asses arrested and will own you for the rest of your lives! Idiots bow down!
Just look but don't touch the tatas, kind of like window shopping
Please amend the decision as to prohibit Maxine Waters and Rosie O'Donnell from going topless!!
Post a Comment