Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Dogs, Strangers and God

A simple social experiment speaks volumes about human nature. 

A while ago a human-interest story from South Africa was reported internationally. As described in the Wall Street Journal:

"On Aug. 4, Graham and Sheryl Anley, while yachting off the coast of South Africa, hit a reef, capsizing their boat. As the boat threatened to sink and they scrambled to get off, Sheryl's safety line snagged on something, trapping her there. Instead of freeing his wife and getting her to shore, Graham grabbed Rosie, their Jack Russell terrier. (One media account reported that Sheryl had insisted that the dog go first). With Rosie safe and sound, Graham returned for Sheryl. All are doing fine."

Since the 1970s, I have asked students if they would first try to save their drowning dog or a drowning stranger. And for 40 years I have received the same results: One third vote for their dog, one third for the stranger, and one third don't know what they would do.

In the Wall Street Journal column, Robert M. Sapolsky, a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University, reported about another such experiment:

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I would save my wife over my dog, but I would feel guilty forever for letting my dog die.
But, for a stranger? Not a choice, good luck buddy, I'm saving my dog, even if I forfeit my life.