Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm

From the world of science – as opposed to grant-troughing junk science – two more studies confirming that the man-made global warming scare is a myth.

One, a study by Scafetta et al, published in International Journal of Heat and Technology, confirms that the “Pause” in global warming is real – and that “climate change” is much more likely the result of natural, cyclical fluctuations than man-made CO2 emissions.

Abstract

The period from 2000 to 2016 shows a modest warming trend that the advocates of the anthropogenic global warming theory have labeled as the “pause” or “hiatus.” These labels were chosen to indicate that the observed temperature standstill period results from an unforced internal fluctuation of the climate (e.g. by heat uptake of the deep ocean) that the computer climate models are claimed to occasionally reproduce without contradicting the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGWT) paradigm. In part 1 of this work, it was shown that the statistical analysis rejects such labels with a 95% confidence because the standstill period has lasted more than the 15 year period limit provided by the AGWT advocates themselves. Anyhow, the strong warming peak observed in 2015-2016, the “hottest year on record,” gave the impression that the temperature standstill stopped in 2014. Herein, the authors show that such a temperature peak is unrelated to anthropogenic forcing: it simply emerged from the natural fast fluctuations of the climate associated to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon. By removing the ENSO signature, the authors show that the temperature trend from 2000 to 2016 clearly diverges from the general circulation model (GCM) simulations. Thus, the GCMs models used to support the AGWT are very likely flawed. By contrast, the semi-empirical climate models proposed in 2011 and 2013 by Scafetta, which are based on a specific set of natural climatic oscillations believed to be astronomically induced plus a significantly reduced anthropogenic contribution, agree far better with the latest observations.

More

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

People are so gullible. It has been known for years that global warming and climate change was just a hoax. Part of the one world agenda to redistribute the wealth. A scam to force the U.S. to give billions of dollars to third world countries for something that was never real. Just think about it. We breathe in oxygen and exhale CO2. The plants of the earth take in or breathe in CO2 and produce or exhale oxygen. It is nature taking care of itself. So all this man-made stuff is nothing but B.S. Oh and it doesn't matter how much a cow farts either.

Anonymous said...

555
Correct.

But the media is trying to convince us that the lines in the sky are not about geoengineering.
They are.
And it is causing weather modification, which is the whole point.

The media is simply trying to make us look away (down)?
Crazy world we live in.

Anonymous said...

It does not matter.Arguments have always been with us.Even in Bible days there were arguments.Climate change arguments have no relevance one way or the other.Just something else to disagree about.

Anonymous said...

There is not a scientific consensus for, as the article says "a consensus among scientists about catastrophic man-made climate change." There is no consensus for panic or alarmist claims as these trumped up scare articles make it sound!

Yes, there IS a consensus among climate scientists.. the consensus it that the world climate is warming, and is likely to be caused by CO2 emissions. The uptick in temperature is not incredibly dramatic, but higher than it would be otherwise... a degree or two, considering global temperatures and changes in temperature through out all of study able history. Following predictions, if it continues, it will continue to get worse.